Ifteni Petru, Szalontay Andreea S, Teodorescu Andreea
1Psychiatry and Neurology Hospital, Brasov, Romania; 2Faculty of Medicine, Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania; and 3Faculty of Medicine, UMF "Gr.T.Popa," Iasi, Romania.
Am J Ther. 2017 Mar/Apr;24(2):e222-e226. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000533.
In the entire world, restraint and seclusion are common interventions in psychiatric inpatient settings because of aggressive behavior.
Our objective was to test for the immediate antiaggressive property of clozapine compared with other antipsychotic treatments in an enriched cohort with high rates of restraint during early hospitalization.
We present a retrospective chart review in all involuntary admissions with schizophrenia during 2011-2014 in Psychiatry and Neurology Hospital, Brasov, Romania. Timing and number of restraints in addition to clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics were extracted. Based on our earlier observation of clinical efficacy of early, fast titration of clozapine, we tested the hypothesis that clozapine treatment was associated with reduced use of restraint and with longer restraint-free periods.
In 115 consecutive patients with schizophrenia (age = 39.7 ± 11.1 years; male = 59%) involuntarily admitted because of externalized (74.7%) or self-directed violence (25.2%), restraint was used in 89.6%; with a median duration of 3 hours until restraint past admission. Antipsychotics used immediately after hospitalization included haloperidol (70.4%), clozapine (11.3%), olanzapine (10.4%), and other second-generation antipsychotics (7.9%). Comparison of restraint characteristics favored immediate clozapine use with highly reduced rates of restraint (23% vs. 95.6%; P < 0.001) and significantly extended hours until restraint [(118, 24, 426 hours) vs. (3, 0.25, 48 hours); median; 25th, 75th percentile; P < 0.001] relative to the remaining cohort. These effects remained highly significant after controlling for potential moderators of restraint use in multivariate models.
These retrospective data suggest an early antiaggressive effect of clozapine during the immediate use of clozapine in highly problematic patients.
在全球范围内,由于攻击性行为,约束和隔离是精神科住院环境中常见的干预措施。
我们的目标是在早期住院期间约束率较高的丰富队列中,测试氯氮平与其他抗精神病药物治疗相比的即时抗攻击特性。
我们对罗马尼亚布拉索夫精神病学与神经病学医院2011年至2014年期间所有非自愿入院的精神分裂症患者进行了回顾性病历审查。除了临床、人口统计学和治疗特征外,还提取了约束的时间和次数。基于我们早期对氯氮平早期快速滴定临床疗效的观察,我们检验了氯氮平治疗与约束使用减少和无约束期延长相关的假设。
115例因外化(74.7%)或自我导向暴力(25.2%)非自愿入院的连续精神分裂症患者(年龄 = 39.7 ± 11.1岁;男性 = 59%)中,89.6%使用了约束措施;入院后至实施约束的中位时间为3小时。住院后立即使用的抗精神病药物包括氟哌啶醇(70.4%)、氯氮平(11.3%)、奥氮平(10.4%)和其他第二代抗精神病药物(7.9%)。与其余队列相比,约束特征比较显示立即使用氯氮平的约束率大幅降低(23%对95.6%;P < 0.001),直至实施约束的时间显著延长[(118, 24, 426小时)对(3, 0.25, 48小时);中位数;第25、75百分位数;P < 0.001]。在多变量模型中控制了约束使用的潜在调节因素后,这些效应仍然非常显著。
这些回顾性数据表明,在高度问题患者中立即使用氯氮平期间,氯氮平具有早期抗攻击作用。