Tong Wei, Lu Zhouyu, Qin Ling, Mauck Robert L, Smith Harvey E, Smith Lachlan J, Malhotra Neil R, Heyworth Martin F, Caldera Franklin, Enomoto-Iwamoto Motomi, Zhang Yejia
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R.China.
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Transl Res. 2017 Mar;181:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
Spinal conditions related to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration cost billions of dollars in the US annually. Despite the prevalence and soaring cost, there is no specific treatment that restores the physiological function of the diseased IVD. Thus, it is vital to develop new treatment strategies to repair the degenerating IVD. Persons with IVD degeneration without back pain or radicular leg pain often do not require any intervention. Only patients with severe back pain related to the IVD degeneration or biomechanical instability are likely candidates for cell therapy. The IVD progressively degenerates with age in humans, and strategies to repair the IVD depend on the stage of degeneration. Cell therapy and cell-based gene therapy aim to address moderate disc degeneration; advanced stage disease may require surgery. Studies involving autologous, allogeneic, and xenogeneic cells have all shown good survival of these cells in the IVD, confirming that the disc niche is an immunologically privileged site, permitting long-term survival of transplanted cells. All of the animal studies reviewed here reported some improvement in disc structure, and 2 studies showed attenuation of local inflammation. Among the 50 studies reviewed, 25 used some type of scaffold, and cell leakage is a consistently noted problem, though some studies showed reduced cell leakage. Hydrogel scaffolds may prevent cell leakage and provide biomechanical support until cells can become established matrix producers. However, these gels need to be optimized to prevent this leakage. Many animal models have been leveraged in this research space. Rabbit is the most frequently used model (28 of 50), followed by rat, pig, and dog. Sheep and goat IVDs resemble those of humans in size and in the absence of notochordal cells. Despite this advantage, there were only 2 sheep and 1 goat studies of 50 studies in this cohort. It is also unclear if a study in large animals is needed before clinical trials since some of the clinical trials proceeded without a study in large animals. No animal studies or clinical trials completely restored IVD structure. However, results suggest cause for optimism. In light of the fact that patients primarily seek medical care for back pain, attenuating local inflammation should be a priority in benchmarks for success. Clinicians generally agree that short-term back pain should be treated conservatively. When interventions are considered, the ideal therapy should also be minimally invasive and concurrent with other procedures such as discography or discectomy. Restoration of tissue structure and preservation of spinal motion are desirable.
在美国,与椎间盘(IVD)退变相关的脊柱疾病每年花费数十亿美元。尽管发病率高且成本飙升,但尚无能够恢复病变IVD生理功能的特异性治疗方法。因此,开发修复退变IVD的新治疗策略至关重要。没有背痛或腿部放射性疼痛的IVD退变患者通常不需要任何干预。只有与IVD退变或生物力学不稳定相关的严重背痛患者才可能是细胞治疗的候选者。在人类中,IVD会随着年龄的增长而逐渐退变,修复IVD的策略取决于退变阶段。细胞治疗和基于细胞的基因治疗旨在解决中度椎间盘退变问题;晚期疾病可能需要手术治疗。涉及自体、异体和异种细胞的研究均表明这些细胞在IVD中具有良好的存活率,证实椎间盘微环境是一个免疫特惠部位,可使移植细胞长期存活。此处回顾的所有动物研究均报告椎间盘结构有一定改善,2项研究显示局部炎症减轻。在回顾的50项研究中,25项使用了某种类型的支架,细胞渗漏是一个一直存在的问题,不过一些研究显示细胞渗漏有所减少。水凝胶支架可防止细胞渗漏,并在细胞能够成为成熟的基质产生者之前提供生物力学支持。然而,这些凝胶需要进行优化以防止渗漏。该研究领域利用了许多动物模型。兔子是最常用的模型(50项研究中有28项),其次是大鼠、猪和狗。绵羊和山羊的IVD在大小和缺乏脊索细胞方面与人类相似。尽管有这一优势,但在这50项研究的队列中,只有2项关于绵羊和1项关于山羊的研究。在进行临床试验之前是否需要进行大型动物研究也不清楚,因为一些临床试验在没有大型动物研究的情况下就进行了。没有动物研究或临床试验能完全恢复IVD结构。然而,结果表明有理由保持乐观。鉴于患者主要因背痛寻求医疗护理,减轻局部炎症应成为成功标准中的首要任务。临床医生普遍认为短期背痛应采用保守治疗。当考虑进行干预时,理想的治疗方法还应是微创的,并与其他程序如椎间盘造影或椎间盘切除术同时进行。组织结构的恢复和脊柱运动的保留是理想的。