Quinn Tyler D, Jakicic John M, Fertman Carl I, Barone Gibbs Bethany
Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 May;71(5):480-486. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207820. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
While active transportation has health, economic and environmental benefits, participation within the USA is low. The purpose of this study is to examine relationships of demographic and workplace factors with health-enhancing active transportation and commuting.
Participants in the 2009 National Household Travel Survey reported demographics, workplace factors (time/distance to work, flextime availability, option to work from home and work start time) and active transportation (for any purpose) or commuting (to and from work, workers only) as walking or biking (≥10 min bouts only). Multiple logistic regression examined cross-sectional relationships between demographics and workplace factors with active transportation and commuting.
Among 152 573 participants, active transportation was reported by 1.11% by biking and 11.74% by walking. Among 111 808 working participants, active commuting was reported by 0.80% by biking and 2.76% by walking. Increased odds (p<0.05) of active commuting and transportation were associated with younger age, lower income, urban dwelling, and the highest and lowest education categories. Males had greater odds of commuting and transporting by bike but decreased odds of walk transporting. Inconsistent patterns were observed by race, but whites had greater odds of any biking (p<0.05). Odds of active commuting were higher with a flexible schedule (p<0.001), the option to work from home (p<0.05), shorter time and distance to work (both p<0.001), and work arrival time between 11:00 and 15:59 (walking only, p=0.001).
Active transportation differed across demographic and workplace factors. These relationships could inform infrastructure policy decisions and workplace wellness programming targeting increased active transportation.
尽管主动出行对健康、经济和环境有益,但美国的参与率较低。本研究的目的是探讨人口统计学和工作场所因素与促进健康的主动出行及通勤之间的关系。
2009年全国家庭出行调查的参与者报告了人口统计学信息、工作场所因素(上班时间/距离、弹性工作时间可用性、在家工作的选项以及工作开始时间)以及主动出行(出于任何目的)或通勤(上下班,仅针对上班族)的方式,即步行或骑自行车(仅≥10分钟的行程)。多元逻辑回归分析了人口统计学和工作场所因素与主动出行及通勤之间的横断面关系。
在152573名参与者中,报告通过骑自行车进行主动出行的占1.11%,通过步行的占11.74%。在111808名在职参与者中,报告通过骑自行车进行主动通勤的占0.80%,通过步行的占2.76%。主动通勤和出行的几率增加(p<0.05)与年龄较小、收入较低、居住在城市以及最高和最低教育类别相关。男性骑自行车通勤和出行的几率更高,但步行出行的几率降低。按种族观察到的模式不一致,但白人进行任何骑自行车出行的几率更高(p<0.05)。有灵活的工作时间表(p<0.001)、在家工作的选项(p<0.05)、较短的上班时间和距离(均p<0.001)以及11:00至15:59之间的工作到达时间(仅步行,p=0.001)时,主动通勤的几率更高。
主动出行在人口统计学和工作场所因素方面存在差异。这些关系可为基础设施政策决策和旨在增加主动出行的工作场所健康计划提供参考。