• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国城市中主动通勤与环境关联的生态分析

An ecological analysis of environmental correlates of active commuting in urban U.S.

作者信息

Fan Jessie X, Wen Ming, Kowaleski-Jones Lori

机构信息

Department of Family and Consumer Studies, University of Utah, 225 S 1400 E AEB 228, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0080, United States.

Department of Sociology, University of Utah, 380 S 1530 E Rm 301, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0250, United States.

出版信息

Health Place. 2014 Nov;30:242-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.09.014
PMID:25460907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4262633/
Abstract

We conduct a cross-sectional ecological analysis to examine environmental correlates of active commuting in 39,660 urban tracts using data from the 2010 Census, 2007-2011 American Community Survey, and other sources. The five-year average (2007-2011) prevalence is 3.05% for walking, 0.63% for biking, and 7.28% for public transportation to work, with higher prevalence for all modes in lower-income tracts. Environmental factors account for more variances in public transportation to work but economic and demographic factors account for more variances in walking and biking to work. Population density, median housing age, street connectivity, tree canopy, distance to parks, air quality, and county sprawl index are associated with active commuting, but the association can vary in size and direction for different transportation mode and for higher-income and lower-income tracts.

摘要

我们进行了一项横断面生态分析,利用2010年人口普查、2007 - 2011年美国社区调查及其他来源的数据,研究39660个城市区域中主动通勤的环境相关因素。步行的五年平均(2007 - 2011年)患病率为3.05%,骑自行车为0.63%,乘坐公共交通上班为7.28%,低收入区域所有出行方式的患病率更高。环境因素在乘坐公共交通上班方面解释了更多的变异,但经济和人口因素在步行和骑自行车上班方面解释了更多的变异。人口密度、住房中位年龄、街道连通性、树冠覆盖率、到公园的距离、空气质量以及县蔓延指数与主动通勤相关,但对于不同的交通方式以及高收入和低收入区域,这种关联在大小和方向上可能会有所不同。

相似文献

1
An ecological analysis of environmental correlates of active commuting in urban U.S.美国城市中主动通勤与环境关联的生态分析
Health Place. 2014 Nov;30:242-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
2
Demographic factors, workplace factors and active transportation use in the USA: a secondary analysis of 2009 NHTS data.美国的人口统计学因素、工作场所因素与主动出行使用情况:对2009年美国国家交通调查数据的二次分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 May;71(5):480-486. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207820. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
3
Built Environment and Active Commuting: Rural-Urban Differences in the U.S.建成环境与主动通勤:美国城乡差异
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Dec;3:435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 10.
4
Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of the active commuting behaviors of U.S. Department of the Interior employees.美国内政部员工的主动通勤行为的横断面和纵向分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 8;19(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6746-9.
5
Sociodemographic and environmental correlates of active commuting in rural America.美国农村地区主动通勤的社会人口学和环境关联因素
J Rural Health. 2015 Spring;31(2):176-85. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12084. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
6
Can Walking or Biking to Work Really Make a Difference? Compact Development, Observed Commuter Choice and Body Mass Index.步行或骑自行车上班真的会有不同吗?紧凑型发展、观察到的通勤选择与身体质量指数。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 8;10(7):e0130903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130903. eCollection 2015.
7
Monitoring State-Level Changes in Walking, Biking, and Taking Public Transit to Work - American Community Survey, 2006 and 2017.监测州级层面工作出行中步行、骑行和乘坐公共交通方式的变化情况——美国社区调查,2006 年和 2017 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Oct 1;17:E115. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200097.
8
Exploring Neighborhood Environments and Active Commuting in Chennai, India.探索印度钦奈的社区环境和积极通勤。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 26;15(9):1840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091840.
9
Public awareness of and support for infrastructure changes designed to increase walking and biking in Los Angeles County.洛杉矶县民众对旨在增加步行和骑行的基础设施变革的认知与支持。
Prev Med. 2015 Mar;72:70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.033. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
10
Factors associated with active commuting among parents-to-be in Karlskrona, Sweden.瑞典卡尔斯克鲁纳准父母主动通勤的相关因素。
Scand J Public Health. 2015 Feb;43(1):59-65. doi: 10.1177/1403494814559119. Epub 2014 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Urban Trees and Human Health: A Scoping Review.城市树木与人类健康:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 18;17(12):4371. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124371.
2
Built Environment and Childhood Weight Status: A Multi-Level Study Using Population-Based Data in the City of Hannover, Germany.建筑环境与儿童体重状况:基于德国汉诺威市人群数据的多水平研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 14;17(8):2694. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082694.
3
Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of the active commuting behaviors of U.S. Department of the Interior employees.美国内政部员工的主动通勤行为的横断面和纵向分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 8;19(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6746-9.
4
Urban Sprawl and Health Outcome Associations in Sicily.西西里岛的城市扩张与健康结果关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 15;16(8):1350. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081350.
5
Intrapersonal and Environmental Correlates of Bicycling in U.S. Adults.美国成年人骑自行车的个体内部和环境相关性。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Mar;54(3):413-418. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
6
Built Environment and Active Commuting: Rural-Urban Differences in the U.S.建成环境与主动通勤:美国城乡差异
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Dec;3:435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 10.
7
Spatial heterogeneity in repeated measures of perceived stress among car commuters in Scania, Sweden.瑞典斯堪尼亚地区通勤者感知压力重复测量中的空间异质性。
Int J Health Geogr. 2016 Jul 27;15(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12942-016-0054-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural-urban differences in objective and subjective measures of physical activity: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2006.城乡地区身体活动客观和主观指标的差异:来自2003 - 2006年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的结果
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Aug 21;11:E141. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140189.
2
Geographic scale matters in detecting the relationship between neighbourhood food environments and obesity risk: an analysis of driver license records in Salt Lake County, Utah.地理尺度在检测邻里食物环境与肥胖风险之间的关系中很重要:对犹他州盐湖县驾照记录的分析
BMJ Open. 2014 Aug 19;4(8):e005458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005458.
3
Sociodemographic and environmental correlates of active commuting in rural America.美国农村地区主动通勤的社会人口学和环境关联因素
J Rural Health. 2015 Spring;31(2):176-85. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12084. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
4
Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity - update and refinement.城市扩张与身体活动、肥胖及发病率之间的关系——更新与完善
Health Place. 2014 Mar;26:118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.12.008. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
5
Social ecological influences on work-related active commuting among adults.社会生态因素对成年人与工作相关的主动通勤的影响。
Am J Health Behav. 2013 Jul;37(4):543-54. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.4.12.
6
Correlates of walking and cycling for transport and recreation: factor structure, reliability and behavioural associations of the perceptions of the environment in the neighbourhood scale (PENS).用于交通和娱乐的步行和骑行的相关性:邻里环境感知量表(PENS)的因子结构、可靠性和行为关联。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Jul 2;10:87. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-87.
7
Population-Adjusted Street Connectivity, Urbanicity and Risk of Obesity in the U.S.美国经人口调整后的街道连通性、城市化程度与肥胖风险
Appl Geogr. 2013 Jul;41:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.03.006.
8
Neighborhood design for walking and biking: physical activity and body mass index.步行和骑车出行的邻里设计:身体活动与身体质量指数
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Mar;44(3):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.024.
9
Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not?身体活动的相关因素:为什么有些人积极参加身体活动,而有些人不这样做?
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):258-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1.
10
Active commuting influences among adults.成年人的积极通勤影响。
Prev Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;54(3-4):237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.01.016. Epub 2012 Feb 1.