Wilkinson Thomas, Sculpher Mark J, Claxton Karl, Revill Paul, Briggs Andrew, Cairns John A, Teerawattananon Yot, Asfaw Elias, Lopert Ruth, Culyer Anthony J, Walker Damian G
PRICELESS SA, Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Unit, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):921-928. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.015.
Policymakers in high-, low-, and middle-income countries alike face challenging choices about resource allocation in health. Economic evaluation can be useful in providing decision makers with the best evidence of the anticipated benefits of new investments, as well as their expected opportunity costs-the benefits forgone of the options not chosen. To guide the decisions of health systems effectively, it is important that the methods of economic evaluation are founded on clear principles, are applied systematically, and are appropriate to the decision problems they seek to inform.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a major funder of economic evaluations of health technologies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), commissioned a "reference case" through the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI) to guide future evaluations, and improve both the consistency and usefulness to decision makers.
The iDSI Reference Case draws on previous insights from the World Health Organization, the US Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health Care, and the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Comprising 11 key principles, each accompanied by methodological specifications and reporting standards, the iDSI Reference Case also serves as a means of identifying priorities for methods research, and can be used as a framework for capacity building and technical assistance in LMICs.
The iDSI Reference Case is an aid to thought, not a substitute for it, and should not be followed slavishly without regard to context, culture, or history. This article presents the iDSI Reference Case and discusses the rationale, approach, components, and application in LMICs.
高收入、低收入和中等收入国家的政策制定者在卫生资源分配方面都面临着具有挑战性的选择。经济评估有助于为决策者提供新投资预期效益的最佳证据,以及预期的机会成本——未被选择的方案所放弃的效益。为了有效地指导卫生系统的决策,经济评估方法基于明确的原则、系统地应用且适用于它们旨在提供信息的决策问题非常重要。
比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会是低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)卫生技术经济评估的主要资助者,通过国际决策支持倡议(iDSI)委托制定了一个“参考案例”,以指导未来的评估,并提高对决策者的一致性和实用性。
iDSI参考案例借鉴了世界卫生组织、美国医疗保健成本效益小组和英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所先前的见解。iDSI参考案例包含11项关键原则,每项原则都附有方法规范和报告标准,它还可作为确定方法研究重点的一种手段,并可作为低收入和中等收入国家能力建设和技术援助的框架。
iDSI参考案例是一种思维辅助工具,而非替代品,不应不顾背景、文化或历史而盲目遵循。本文介绍了iDSI参考案例,并讨论了其基本原理、方法、组成部分以及在低收入和中等收入国家的应用。