Frei M R, Jauchem J R, Padilla J M, Merritt J H
Radiation Physics Branch, US Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, TX 78235.
Radiat Environ Biophys. 1989;28(3):235-46. doi: 10.1007/BF01211260.
Ketamine-anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed in both E and H orientations to far-field 2.45-GHz continuous-wave radiofrequency radiation (RFR) at a power density of 60 mW/cm2 (whole-body average specific absorption rate of approximately 14 W/kg). Intermittent exposures were performed in both orientations in the same animal to repeatedly increase colonic temperature from 38.5 to 39.5 degrees C. Tympanic, subcutaneous (sides toward and away from RFR source), and colonic temperature, ECG, arterial blood pressure, and respiratory rate were continuously recorded. The pattern of heat distribution within the animal and the physiological responses were significantly different between E- and H-orientation exposure. Irradiation in E orientation resulted in greater peripheral and tympanic heating, while irradiation in H orientation resulted in greater core heating. Heart rate and blood pressure increased significantly during irradiation and returned to baseline levels when exposure was discontinued; the increases were significantly greater in E than in H orientation. Respiratory rate increased significantly during irradiation in H, but not in E orientation. The physiological responses could have been influenced by the different levels or rates of subcutaneous and tympanic heating, or the differential between core and peripheral heating during E- and H-orientation irradiation. These results suggest that, when interpreting results of RFR exposure, animal orientation during irradiation must be considered.
将氯胺酮麻醉的Sprague-Dawley大鼠在E和H两种取向中暴露于功率密度为60 mW/cm²(全身平均比吸收率约为14 W/kg)的远场2.45 GHz连续波射频辐射(RFR)。在同一动物的两种取向中进行间歇性暴露,以将结肠温度从38.5℃反复升高至39.5℃。连续记录鼓膜温度、皮下温度(朝向和远离RFR源的两侧)、结肠温度、心电图、动脉血压和呼吸频率。E取向和H取向暴露之间,动物体内的热分布模式和生理反应存在显著差异。E取向照射导致外周和鼓膜升温更大,而H取向照射导致核心升温更大。照射期间心率和血压显著升高,停止暴露后恢复到基线水平;E取向的升高显著大于H取向。H取向照射期间呼吸频率显著增加,而E取向则没有。生理反应可能受到皮下和鼓膜升温的不同水平或速率的影响,或者受到E取向和H取向照射期间核心与外周升温差异的影响。这些结果表明,在解释RFR暴露结果时,必须考虑照射期间动物的取向。