Gómez Y, Terranova M, Zähner M, Hillmann E, Savary P
Research Group Work, Building and System Assessment, Research Institute Agroscope ISS, 8356 Ettenhausen, Switzerland; Ethology and Animal Welfare Unit, Department of Environmental System Sciences, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Animal Nutrition, Department of Environmental System Sciences, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; Livestock Systems Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Feb;100(2):1331-1339. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11589. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
Dairy cow body size has increased over time because of breeding selection for higher milk yield, but milking stall dimensions have never been adjusted and are based on the practical experience of milking-machine manufacturers and advisory institutions. Narrow, limited milking stall dimensions might lead to behavioral changes during milking due to lack of comfort. The aim of this study was to examine the current space allowance in milking stalls on dairy farms and assess the effect of space allowance on cow behavior during milking. On 15 Swiss dairy farms, we measured clear milking stall dimensions and cow body dimensions. We calculated space ratios for length (SR) and width (SR) by dividing the milking stall length or width by cow body length or belly width, respectively. When the space ratio was >1, we assumed that the body length or width of cow was smaller than the milking stall length or width. On each farm, 10 healthy cows were chosen for behavioral observation during 1 evening milking. We recorded rumination, elimination, and latency to enter the milking stall by direct observation. Hind leg activity was recorded using acceleration loggers. Data were analyzed using general linear mixed-effects models with farm as a random effect. Due to a strong collinearity between SR and SR, we chose SR for further analysis, because it is based on skeletal characteristics. The SR was smallest in side-by-side parlors (1.07 ± 0.01) and largest in tandem parlors (1.18 ± 0.01). More cows had a tendency to ruminate with increasing SR (odds ratio: 1.8). None of hind leg activity, maximum peaks of hind leg accelerations, or latency to enter the milking stall were significantly affected by SR. Latency to enter the milking stall was longer for group milking parlors (side-by-side: 44.0 ± 3.2 s; herringbone: 34.3 ± 2.9 s) than for tandem parlors (19.0 ± 2.7 s). Milking parlor type had no effect on hind leg activity, maximum peaks of hind leg accelerations or rumination. The SR affected rumination behavior to some extent, indicating that cow comfort was positively affected by larger milking stall length. Because cow comfort is important for good milking performance, further investigations of milking stall dimensions for cow comfort and thus welfare are needed. Furthermore, the results showed that parlor type affected cow behavior, irrespective of SR, making future research necessary to identify the factors leading to this effect of parlor type.
随着时间的推移,由于对更高产奶量的选育,奶牛的体型增大了,但挤奶台的尺寸从未调整过,其尺寸是基于挤奶机制造商和咨询机构的实践经验确定的。挤奶台狭窄、有限的尺寸可能会因缺乏舒适度而导致挤奶过程中的行为变化。本研究的目的是检查奶牛场挤奶台目前的空间余量,并评估空间余量对挤奶过程中奶牛行为的影响。在15个瑞士奶牛场,我们测量了挤奶台的净尺寸和奶牛的身体尺寸。我们分别用挤奶台的长度或宽度除以奶牛的体长或腹宽,计算出长度空间比(SR)和宽度空间比(SR)。当空间比>1时,我们认为奶牛的体长或体宽小于挤奶台的长度或宽度。在每个农场,选择10头健康奶牛在一次晚间挤奶过程中进行行为观察。我们通过直接观察记录反刍、排泄以及进入挤奶台的潜伏期。使用加速度记录仪记录后肢活动。数据采用以农场为随机效应的一般线性混合效应模型进行分析。由于SR和SR之间存在很强的共线性,我们选择SR进行进一步分析,因为它基于骨骼特征。SR在并列式挤奶厅最小(1.07±0.01),在串联式挤奶厅最大(1.18±0.01)。随着SR增加,更多奶牛有反刍的倾向(优势比:1.8)。SR对后肢活动、后肢加速度的最大峰值或进入挤奶台的潜伏期均无显著影响。集体挤奶厅(并列式:44.0±3.2秒;鱼骨式:34.3±2.9秒)奶牛进入挤奶台的潜伏期比串联式挤奶厅(19.0±2.7秒)更长。挤奶厅类型对后肢活动、后肢加速度的最大峰值或反刍没有影响。SR在一定程度上影响反刍行为,表明挤奶台长度增加对奶牛舒适度有积极影响。由于奶牛舒适度对良好的挤奶性能很重要,因此需要进一步研究挤奶台尺寸以提高奶牛舒适度,进而提升奶牛福利。此外,结果表明挤奶厅类型影响奶牛行为,与SR无关,因此未来有必要开展研究以确定导致挤奶厅类型产生这种影响的因素。