Rosello Alicia, Horner Carolyne, Hopkins Susan, Hayward Andrew C, Deeny Sarah R
1Institute of Health Informatics,Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research,UCL,London,United Kingdom.
3Regional Laboratory Leeds,Public Health England,Leeds,United Kingdom.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;38(2):216-225. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.286. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
OBJECTIVES (1) To systematically search for all dynamic mathematical models of infectious disease transmission in long-term care facilities (LTCFs); (2) to critically evaluate models of interventions against antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in this setting; and (3) to develop a checklist for hospital epidemiologists and policy makers by which to distinguish good quality models of AMR in LTCFs. METHODS The CINAHL, EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for studies of dynamic mathematical models set in LTCFs. Models of interventions targeting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in LTCFs were critically assessed. Using this analysis, we developed a checklist for good quality mathematical models of AMR in LTCFs. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Overall, 18 papers described mathematical models that characterized the spread of infectious diseases in LTCFs, but no models of AMR in gram-negative bacteria in this setting were described. Future models of AMR in LTCFs require a more robust methodology (ie, formal model fitting to data and validation), greater transparency regarding model assumptions, setting-specific data, realistic and current setting-specific parameters, and inclusion of movement dynamics between LTCFs and hospitals. CONCLUSIONS Mathematical models of AMR in gram-negative bacteria in the LTCF setting, where these bacteria are increasingly becoming prevalent, are needed to help guide infection prevention and control. Improvements are required to develop outputs of sufficient quality to help guide interventions and policy in the future. We suggest a checklist of criteria to be used as a practical guide to determine whether a model is robust enough to test policy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:216-225.
(1)系统检索长期护理机构(LTCF)中传染病传播的所有动态数学模型;(2)严格评估该环境下针对抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)的干预模型;(3)为医院流行病学家和政策制定者制定一份清单,用以区分LTCF中高质量的AMR模型。方法:系统检索CINAHL、EMBASE、Global Health、MEDLINE和Scopus数据库,查找在LTCF中设置的动态数学模型研究。对LTCF中针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的干预模型进行严格评估。利用该分析,我们制定了一份LTCF中高质量AMR数学模型的清单。结果与讨论:总体而言,18篇论文描述了表征LTCF中传染病传播的数学模型,但未描述该环境下革兰氏阴性菌AMR的模型。未来LTCF中的AMR模型需要更稳健的方法(即对数据进行正式模型拟合和验证),在模型假设、特定环境数据、现实且当前特定环境参数方面有更高的透明度,并纳入LTCF与医院之间的流动动态。结论:在LTCF环境中,革兰氏阴性菌AMR日益普遍,需要数学模型来帮助指导感染预防和控制。需要改进以开发出足够高质量的产出,以帮助指导未来的干预措施和政策。我们建议一份标准清单,用作确定模型是否稳健到足以测试政策的实用指南。《感染控制与医院流行病学》2017年;38:216 - 225。