Weinstein Philip, Delean Steven, Wood Tom, Austin Andrew D
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia.
Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, and Department of Genetics and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia.
IMA Fungus. 2016 Dec;7(2):229-234. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2016.07.02.01. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
Bioluminescence has been known from fungi since ancient times, but little work has been done to establish its potential role. There is evidence that some bioluminescent fungi differentially attract potential spore-dispersing insects, and we aimed to establish if this was the case for the ghost fungus, (), a widespread Australian temperate zone species. We examined three corroborative lines of evidence: circadian rhythmicity of bioluminescence; field-recorded insect abundance at the time of basidiome production; and attractiveness of glowing fungi to flying insects. Basidiomes glowed continuously day and night, and were present in winter (June-July) when insect abundance was low. To assess attractiveness, we deployed sticky-traps in open woodland in the absence of light pollution, in Treatment (baited with fresh bioluminescent ) and Control pairs, for 480 trap-hours on moonless nights. There was no statistical difference in mean insect abundance between Treatment and Control traps (mean 0.33 and 0.54 individuals per trap night, respectively). To interpret these results, we provide a brief review of competing hypotheses for fungal bioluminescence, and conclude that for some fungi, bioluminescence may be an incidental by-product of metabolism rather than conferring any selective advantage. It is possible that the role of bioluminescence differs among evolutionary lineages of fungi and/or with attributes of their growth environments that could affect spore dispersal, such as wind and insect abundance.
自古以来人们就知道真菌会发光,但对于确定其潜在作用的研究却很少。有证据表明,一些发光真菌会有差异地吸引潜在的孢子传播昆虫,我们旨在确定澳大利亚温带广泛分布的鬼笔鹅膏菌(学名:Amanita phalloides)是否也是如此。我们研究了三条相互印证的证据:生物发光的昼夜节律;担子果产生时实地记录的昆虫数量;发光真菌对飞行昆虫的吸引力。担子果日夜持续发光,且在昆虫数量较少的冬季(6月至7月)出现。为了评估其吸引力,我们在没有光污染的开阔林地设置了粘性诱捕器,在无月的夜晚,分别在处理组(用新鲜发光的鬼笔鹅膏菌诱饵)和对照组设置诱捕器,每个诱捕器放置480小时。处理组和对照组诱捕器捕获的昆虫平均数量没有统计学差异(分别为每个诱捕器每晚0.33只和0.54只)。为了解释这些结果,我们简要回顾了关于真菌生物发光的相互竞争的假说,并得出结论,对于一些真菌来说,生物发光可能是新陈代谢的偶然副产品,而不是具有任何选择优势。生物发光的作用可能在真菌的进化谱系之间存在差异,和/或与它们生长环境中可能影响孢子传播的因素有关,如风以及昆虫数量。