• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种特定的刷牙顺序与牙菌斑清除效果:一项随机分组的口内对照设计。

A specific brushing sequence and plaque removal efficacy: a randomized split-mouth design.

作者信息

Van der Sluijs E, Slot D E, Hennequin-Hoenderdos N L, Van der Weijden G A

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Dent Hyg. 2018 Feb;16(1):85-91. doi: 10.1111/idh.12262. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1111/idh.12262
PMID:27990769
Abstract

AIM

It has been propagated by the dental care professionals to start toothbrushing the lingual aspect of teeth first. In general, it is assumed that these surfaces of teeth are more difficult to clean. The evidence to support this recommendation is sparse.

METHOD

In this randomized controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design, 46 students were included. Before the visit, the participants were requested to refrain from any oral hygiene procedure for 48 h. First, the plaque index (PI) score was assessed full mouth. Two randomly chosen contra-lateral quadrants were used to start brushing from the lingual aspect first. The opposing two quadrants were used to start brushing from the buccal aspect. After the brushing exercise was completed, full-mouth PI was scored again. Subanalyses were performed for the buccal, lingual and approximal surfaces.

RESULTS

At baseline, there was no statistically significant difference between the two sets of contra-lateral quadrants (P = 0.770). Starting at the lingual aspect of the lower jaw resulted in a 55% reduction of plaque scores in comparison with 58% when the brushing exercise was started buccally. [Correction added on 16 January 2017, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, the percentage reduction of plaque scores when the brushing exercise was started buccally, was previously wrong and has been corrected to 58% throughout this article.] The difference in mean plaque scores between brushing orders was 0.04, which was not significant (P = 0.219). None of the subanalyses revealed any significant differences for the isolated surfaces.

CONCLUSION

Using a manual toothbrush reduced the plaque scores between 55 and 58% with no difference between brushing from either the lingual or buccal aspect first. Within the limitations of this study, a recommendation to start toothbrushing the lingual aspect is not supported by the outcome in this young student population.

摘要

目的

牙科护理专业人员一直倡导先从牙齿舌面开始刷牙。一般认为,牙齿的这些表面更难清洁。支持这一建议的证据很少。

方法

在这项采用分口设计的随机对照临床试验中,纳入了46名学生。在就诊前,要求参与者48小时内不进行任何口腔卫生操作。首先,评估全口菌斑指数(PI)得分。随机选择两个对侧象限先从舌面开始刷牙。相对的两个象限则从颊面开始刷牙。刷牙练习完成后,再次对全口PI进行评分。对颊面、舌面和邻面进行亚组分析。

结果

在基线时,两组对侧象限之间无统计学显著差异(P = 0.770)。从下颌舌面开始刷牙,菌斑得分降低了55%,而从颊面开始刷牙时降低了58%。[2017年1月16日首次在线发表后添加的更正:在前一句中,从颊面开始刷牙时菌斑得分降低的百分比之前有误,在本文中已全部更正为58%。]刷牙顺序之间的平均菌斑得分差异为0.04,无统计学显著性(P = 0.219)。亚组分析均未显示各单独表面有任何显著差异。

结论

使用手动牙刷可使菌斑得分降低55%至58%,先从舌面或颊面刷牙之间无差异。在本研究的局限性内,对于年轻学生群体,本研究结果不支持先从牙齿舌面开始刷牙的建议。

相似文献

1
A specific brushing sequence and plaque removal efficacy: a randomized split-mouth design.一种特定的刷牙顺序与牙菌斑清除效果:一项随机分组的口内对照设计。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2018 Feb;16(1):85-91. doi: 10.1111/idh.12262. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
2
Prebrushing rinse with water on plaque removal: a split-mouth design.刷牙前用水冲洗对牙菌斑的清除作用:一项分口设计研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2017 Nov;15(4):345-351. doi: 10.1111/idh.12216. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
3
Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.两种牙菌斑指数在评估牙刷效果中的相关性。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Nov 1;7(5):1-9.
4
Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.将冲洗与牙线作为刷牙辅助手段的比较:对出血、牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(3):71-7.
5
A thirty-day evaluation of the Rowenta Dentiphant powered toothbrush in children for safety and efficacy.对儿童使用的Rowenta Dentiphant电动牙刷进行的为期30天的安全性和有效性评估。
J Clin Dent. 1996;7(4):96-100.
6
Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷在已形成的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A5-10.
7
Efficacy of two different toothbrush heads on a sonic power toothbrush compared to a manual toothbrush on established gingivitis and plaque.与手动牙刷相比,两种不同刷头的声波电动牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(4):65-70.
8
The safety and efficacy of a children's power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush in 6-11 year-olds.儿童电动牙刷和手动牙刷对6至11岁儿童的安全性和有效性。
Am J Dent. 2001 Aug;14(4):195-9.
9
The addition of a water flosser to power tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and plaque.在电动牙刷的基础上增加水牙线:对出血、牙龈炎和牙菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23(2):57-63.
10
The plaque-removing efficacy of a finger brush (I-Brush).手指刷(I型牙刷)的牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Dec;31(12):1084-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00607.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Desensitizing Toothpastes Also Have an Effect on Gingival Inflammation? A Double-Blind, Three-Treatment Crossover Clinical Trial.脱敏牙膏是否也能对牙龈炎症产生作用?一项双盲、三处理交叉临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 1;17(23):8927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238927.
2
Effectiveness of Manual Toothbrushing Techniques on Plaque and Gingivitis: A Systematic Review.手动刷牙技术对牙菌斑和牙龈炎的有效性:一项系统评价。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Oct 2;18(4):843-854. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a45354.
3
Cleansing efficacy of an auto-cleaning electronic toothbrushing device: a randomized-controlled crossover pilot study.
自动清洁电动牙刷清洁效果的随机对照交叉试验研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan;25(1):247-253. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03359-5. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
4
Visualization and Quantification of the Oral Hygiene Effects of Brushing, Dentifrice Use, and Brush Wear Using a Tooth Brushing Simulator.使用刷牙模拟器对刷牙、使用牙膏和牙刷磨损的口腔卫生效果进行可视化和量化。
Front Public Health. 2019 May 8;7:91. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00091. eCollection 2019.
5
Plaque control and reduction of gingivitis: The evidence for dentifrices.控制牙菌斑和减少牙龈炎:牙膏的作用证据。
Periodontol 2000. 2019 Feb;79(1):221-232. doi: 10.1111/prd.12257.
6
Toothbrushing Systematics Index (TSI) - A new tool for quantifying systematics in toothbrushing behaviour.刷牙系统学指数(TSI)-一种量化刷牙行为系统学的新工具。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 30;13(4):e0196497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196497. eCollection 2018.