• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童电动牙刷和手动牙刷对6至11岁儿童的安全性和有效性。

The safety and efficacy of a children's power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush in 6-11 year-olds.

作者信息

García-Godoy F, Marcushamer M, Cugini M, Warren P R

机构信息

School of Dental Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2001 Aug;14(4):195-9.

PMID:11699736
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the oral hard and soft tissue safety and the plaque-removing efficacy of a children's power toothbrush (Braun Oral-B Kids' Power Toothbrush-D10) and a manual toothbrush in children from a general population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy children aged 6-11 yrs were enrolled into a single-blind, randomized, parallel-design study. At baseline, oral hard and soft tissues were evaluated and plaque was assessed on buccal and lingual surfaces of all fully erupted permanent and primary teeth using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index. Eligible subjects were randomized to use either a Braun Oral-B children's power toothbrush (D10) or a manual toothbrush for the duration of the study. Subjects were instructed to brush their teeth at home twice daily for 1 min each day for the 30-day study period. At baseline and after 15 and 30 days, plaque was assessed following 12-18 hrs of no oral hygiene. In addition, at each visit single-use plaque removal was evaluated after subjects had brushed their teeth for 1 min under supervision. Oral hard and soft tissues were assessed for safety before and after the supervised 1-min brushing at each visit.

RESULTS

There were no pre-brushing oral hard and soft tissue abnormalities or post-brushing changes in oral tissues in either group. There were statistically significant reductions in mean plaque index for the whole mouth (P< 0.006), buccal surfaces (P < 0.0001) and anterior teeth (P< 0.008) from day 0 to day 30 in the D10 group, but not in the manual group. Greater mean changes in whole mouth plaque reduction were seen for the D10 group as compared to the manual group at days 15 and 30 (P< 0.05). Results from the single-use supervised brushing at each visit revealed that reductions in mean whole mouth plaque were statistically significant in both groups at each visit (P< 0.0001). There was statistically significantly greater plaque removal after a single brushing at day 0 in the D10 group compared with the manual group (P< 0.002), but the difference was not significant at days 15 and 30.

摘要

目的

评估并比较一款儿童电动牙刷(博朗欧乐B儿童电动牙刷-D10)和一款手动牙刷在普通儿童人群中对口腔软硬组织的安全性及去除牙菌斑的效果。

材料与方法

70名6至11岁的儿童参与了一项单盲、随机、平行设计的研究。基线时,评估口腔软硬组织,并使用对Quigley-Hein菌斑指数的Turesky改良版,在所有完全萌出的恒牙和乳牙的颊面和舌面评估牙菌斑。符合条件的受试者被随机分配在研究期间使用博朗欧乐B儿童电动牙刷(D10)或手动牙刷。受试者被指导在为期30天的研究期间每天在家刷牙两次,每次1分钟。在基线以及15天和30天后,在未进行口腔卫生清洁12 - 18小时后评估牙菌斑。此外,每次就诊时,在受试者在监督下刷牙1分钟后评估一次性去除牙菌斑的情况。每次就诊时,在监督下刷牙1分钟前后评估口腔软硬组织的安全性。

结果

两组在刷牙前均未出现口腔软硬组织异常,刷牙后口腔组织也未出现变化。D10组从第0天到第30天,全口(P < 0.006)、颊面(P < 0.0001)和前牙(P < 0.008)的平均菌斑指数有统计学显著降低,而手动组没有。在第15天和第30天,D10组全口菌斑减少的平均变化比手动组更大(P < 0.05)。每次就诊时一次性监督刷牙的结果显示,两组每次就诊时全口平均菌斑减少均有统计学显著意义(P < 0.0001)。在第0天,D10组单次刷牙后去除牙菌斑的效果在统计学上显著优于手动组(P < 0.002),但在第15天和第30天差异不显著。

相似文献

1
The safety and efficacy of a children's power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush in 6-11 year-olds.儿童电动牙刷和手动牙刷对6至11岁儿童的安全性和有效性。
Am J Dent. 2001 Aug;14(4):195-9.
2
Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.一款具有微脉冲刷毛和先进分体刷头设计的新型手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除功效。
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(2):49-54.
3
Safety, efficacy and acceptability of a new power toothbrush: a 3-month comparative clinical investigation.一款新型电动牙刷的安全性、有效性和可接受性:一项为期3个月的对比临床研究。
Am J Dent. 2001 Feb;14(1):3-7.
4
A thirty-day evaluation of the Rowenta Dentiphant powered toothbrush in children for safety and efficacy.对儿童使用的Rowenta Dentiphant电动牙刷进行的为期30天的安全性和有效性评估。
J Clin Dent. 1996;7(4):96-100.
5
Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.两种牙菌斑指数在评估牙刷效果中的相关性。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Nov 1;7(5):1-9.
6
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating battery-powered toothbrush and a standard manual toothbrush.振荡/旋转式电池供电牙刷与标准手动牙刷的安全性和有效性比较。
Am J Dent. 2001 Nov;14 Spec No:25B-28B.
7
Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.一种新型实验性电池驱动牙刷相对于两种先进设计手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):191-7.
8
Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush. results from two independent studies.电动牙刷功效的临床评估。两项独立研究的结果。
Am J Dent. 2001 Oct;14(5):273-7.
9
Safety and plaque removal efficacy of a battery-operated power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush.一款电动牙刷和一款手动牙刷的安全性及牙菌斑清除效果
Am J Dent. 2001 Nov;14 Spec No:9B-12B.
10
Plaque removal efficacy of a prototype power toothbrush compared to a positive control manual toothbrush.与阳性对照手动牙刷相比,一款原型电动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果。
Am J Dent. 2003 Aug;16(4):223-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of the Relative Effect on Plaque Index among Pediatric Patients Using Powered (Electric) versus Manual Toothbrushes.使用电动牙刷与手动牙刷对儿科患者牙菌斑指数相对影响的系统评价和荟萃分析
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;11(2):46. doi: 10.3390/dj11020046.
2
Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy with Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in 10-14-year-old Visually and Auditory Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Study.10 - 14岁视力和听力受损儿童使用电动牙刷和手动牙刷去除牙菌斑效果的比较:一项随机对照研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):364-368. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1949.
3
Randomised clinical study of plaque removal efficacy of an electric toothbrush in primary and mixed dentition.
电动牙刷在乳牙和混合牙列中菌斑去除效果的随机临床试验。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Sep;31(5):657-663. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12753. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
4
Oral cleanliness in daily users of powered vs. manual toothbrushes - a cross-sectional study.日常使用电动牙刷与手动牙刷人群的口腔清洁状况 - 一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 May 29;19(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0790-9.
5
Oral Hygiene Practices among Saudi Arabian Children and Its Relation to Their Dental Caries Status.沙特阿拉伯儿童的口腔卫生习惯及其与龋齿状况的关系。
Int J Dent. 2018 Apr 16;2018:3234970. doi: 10.1155/2018/3234970. eCollection 2018.
6
Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health.电动牙刷与手动牙刷对口腔健康的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD002281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub3.