Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet.
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University.
Psychol Assess. 2017 Oct;29(10):1261-1272. doi: 10.1037/pas0000421. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
The Quick Delay Questionnaire (QDQ) is a self-report measure of delay-related behaviors in adults, and the present study aimed at investigating the psychometric properties of QDQ scores, how well they can discriminate between ADHD adults and both clinical and nonclinical controls, as well as their relations to measures of functional impairments. In the present study, QDQ ratings, a laboratory measure of delay discounting, and ratings of functional impairments were collected from adults diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; n = 51), a clinical control group with other psychiatric disorders (n = 46), and a nonclinical control group (n = 105). Results showed that the QDQ scores showed adequate reliability. Adults with ADHD had higher scores compared with normal controls on both QDQ subscales, and they also reported higher levels of delay aversion than the clinical controls. Logistic regression analyses showed high specificity but low sensitivity when trying to discriminate between adults with ADHD and nonclinical controls. QDQ scores were not associated with a laboratory measure of delay discounting, but with functional impairments such as substance use, criminality, and money management. Our findings indicate that QDQ scores are reliable, but this instrument should be regarded as a complement rather than as a replacement for laboratory measures. The relatively low sensitivity of QDQ scores is in line with current models of heterogeneity stating that only a subgroup of individuals with ADHD has high levels of delay-related behaviors. Our findings further indicate that this subgroup may be at particularly high risk for problems in everyday life. (PsycINFO Database Record
《快速延迟问卷(QDQ)》是一种用于评估成年人延迟相关行为的自评量表,本研究旨在探讨 QDQ 评分的心理测量特性,它们在区分 ADHD 成年人与临床和非临床对照组方面的表现如何,以及它们与功能障碍测量之间的关系。在本研究中,从被诊断为注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD;n = 51)的成年人、患有其他精神障碍的临床对照组(n = 46)和非临床对照组(n = 105)中收集了 QDQ 评分、延迟折扣实验室测量和功能障碍评分。结果表明,QDQ 评分具有足够的可靠性。与正常对照组相比,ADHD 成年人在 QDQ 两个分量表上的得分都更高,并且他们报告的延迟厌恶程度也高于临床对照组。逻辑回归分析表明,当试图区分 ADHD 成年人和非临床对照组时,该方法具有较高的特异性但较低的敏感性。QDQ 评分与延迟折扣的实验室测量无关,但与功能障碍有关,如物质使用、犯罪和财务管理。我们的研究结果表明,QDQ 评分是可靠的,但该工具应被视为实验室测量的补充,而不是替代。QDQ 评分的敏感性相对较低,这与当前关于异质性的模型一致,即只有一小部分 ADHD 成年人具有高水平的与延迟相关的行为。我们的研究结果进一步表明,这个亚组可能在日常生活中面临特别高的问题风险。