Suppr超能文献

评估高中橄榄球运动员在使用贴布和高帮防滑鞋时的姿势控制和踝关节松弛度。

Evaluating Postural Control and Ankle Laxity Between Taping and High-Top Cleats in High School Football Players.

作者信息

Pizac Douglas A, Swanik Charles B, Glutting Joseph J, Kaminski Thomas W

出版信息

J Sport Rehabil. 2018 Mar 1;27(2):111-117. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0084. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Lateral ankle sprains are the most common injuries in high school sports. While ankle taping is a preferred method of external prophylactic support, its restrictive properties decline during exercise. The Under Armour Highlight cleat is marketed on the premise that it provides added support without the need for additional ankle taping.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if differences in ankle joint laxity and postural control exist between football players wearing the Under Armour Highlight cleat (Under Armour Inc, Baltimore, MD) as compared to a low/mid-top cleat with ankle tape.

DESIGN

Crossover trial.

SETTING

Athletic training room and football practice field sideline.

PATIENTS

32 interscholastic football players (15.8 ± 1.0 y; 178.9 ± 7.4 cm; 87.1 ± 21.4 kg).

INTERVENTIONS

Ankle laxity was assessed using an instrumented ankle arthrometer (Blue Bay Research Inc, Milton, FL), while postural control testing was performed on the Tekscan MobileMat™ Balanced Error Scoring System (BESS; South Boston, MA). The 2 treatments included Under Armour Highlight cleats and a low/mid-top cleat with ankle tape applied to the nondominant ankle only. Measurements were taken before and immediately after practice.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The independent variable was treatment (Highlight vs low/mid-top cleat with ankle tape). Dependent variables included ankle arthrometry measures of anterior displacement (mm), inversion/eversion rotation (deg), and the modified BESS error scores. A linear mixed-effects model was used for analysis.

RESULTS

The low/mid-top cleat with tape condition had significantly higher inversion range-of-motion (ROM) and inversion/eversion rotation postexercise when compared to the Highlight cleat (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study provide some evidence that the Under Armour Highlight cleat restricts ankle ROM following a training session better than the taped low/mid-top cleat. Further study is warranted to determine if this high-top style of football cleat can reduce the incidence of ankle sprains and how it might compare to spat taping.

摘要

背景

外侧踝关节扭伤是高中体育活动中最常见的损伤。虽然踝关节贴扎是一种常用的外部预防性支撑方法,但其限制性能在运动过程中会下降。安德玛(Under Armour)Highlight防滑钉鞋的卖点是无需额外的踝关节贴扎就能提供额外支撑。

目的

比较穿着安德玛Highlight防滑钉鞋(安德玛公司,马里兰州巴尔的摩)的足球运动员与穿着带有踝关节贴扎的低帮/中帮防滑钉鞋的运动员在踝关节松弛度和姿势控制方面是否存在差异。

设计

交叉试验。

地点

运动训练室和足球训练场边。

患者

32名校际足球运动员(15.8±1.0岁;178.9±7.4厘米;87.1±21.4千克)。

干预措施

使用仪器化踝关节测角仪(蓝湾研究公司,佛罗里达州米尔顿)评估踝关节松弛度,同时在Tekscan MobileMat™平衡误差评分系统(BESS;马萨诸塞州南波士顿)上进行姿势控制测试。两种治疗方法包括安德玛Highlight防滑钉鞋和仅在非优势脚踝上应用踝关节贴扎的低帮/中帮防滑钉鞋。在训练前和训练后立即进行测量。

主要观察指标

自变量为治疗方法(Highlight防滑钉鞋与带有踝关节贴扎的低帮/中帮防滑钉鞋)。因变量包括踝关节测角法测量的前向位移(毫米)、内翻/外翻旋转(度)以及改良的BESS误差评分。采用线性混合效应模型进行分析。

结果

与Highlight防滑钉鞋相比,带有贴扎的低帮/中帮防滑钉鞋在运动后内翻活动范围(ROM)和内翻/外翻旋转方面显著更高(P<0.05)。

结论

本研究结果提供了一些证据,表明安德玛Highlight防滑钉鞋在训练后比带有贴扎的低帮/中帮防滑钉鞋能更好地限制踝关节ROM。有必要进一步研究这种高帮款式的足球防滑钉鞋是否能降低踝关节扭伤的发生率,以及它与护胫贴扎相比如何。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验