From Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois; Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York; and Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Feb 7;166(3):172-179. doi: 10.7326/M16-0086. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
Little is known about whether insurance expansion affects the location and type of emergency department (ED) use. Understanding these changes can inform state-level decisions about the Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).
To investigate the effect of the 2014 ACA Medicaid expansion on the location, insurance status, and type of ED visits.
Quasi-experimental observational study from 2012 to 2014.
126 investor-owned, hospital-based EDs.
Uninsured and Medicaid-insured adults aged 18 to 64 years.
ACA expansion of Medicaid in January 2014.
Number of ED visits overall, type of visit (for example, nondiscretionary or nonemergency), and average travel time to the ED. Interrupted time-series analyses comparing changes from the end of 2013 to end of 2014 for patients from Medicaid expansion versus nonexpansion states were done.
There were 1.06 million ED visits among patients from 17 Medicaid expansion states, and 7.87 million ED visits among patients from 19 nonexpansion states. The EDs treating patients from Medicaid expansion states saw an overall 47.1% decrease in uninsured visits (95% CI, -65.0% to -29.3%) and a 125.7% (CI, 89.2% to 162.6%) increase in Medicaid visits after 12 months of ACA expansion. Average travel time for nondiscretionary conditions requiring immediate medical care decreased by 0.9 minutes (-6.2% [CI, -8.9% to -3.5%]) among all Medicaid patients from expansion states. We found little evidence of similar changes among patients from nonexpansion states.
Results reflect shifts in ED care at investor-owned facilities, which limits generalizability to other hospital types.
Meaningful changes in insurance status and location and type of ED visits in the first year of ACA Medicaid expansion were found, suggesting that expansion provides patients with a greater choice of hospital facilities.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
对于保险范围的扩大是否会影响急诊部(ED)的使用地点和类型,人们知之甚少。了解这些变化可以为州级层面在《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(ACA)下决定扩大医疗补助提供信息。
调查 2014 年 ACA 医疗补助扩大对 ED 就诊地点、保险状况和类型的影响。
2012 年至 2014 年的准实验观察性研究。
126 家投资者所有、以医院为基础的 ED。
18 至 64 岁的未参保和参保的成年人。
2014 年 1 月 ACA 扩大医疗补助。
总体 ED 就诊次数、就诊类型(例如,非任意或非紧急)以及前往 ED 的平均旅行时间。对来自医疗补助扩大州和非扩大州的患者在 2013 年底至 2014 年底的变化进行了中断时间序列分析。
在来自 17 个医疗补助扩大州的患者中,有 106 万次 ED 就诊,在来自 19 个非扩大州的患者中,有 787 万次 ED 就诊。治疗来自医疗补助扩大州患者的 ED 就诊量总体上减少了 47.1%(95%CI,-65.0%至-29.3%),在 ACA 扩大后的 12 个月内,医疗补助就诊量增加了 125.7%(CI,89.2%至 162.6%)。需要立即进行医疗护理的非任意性疾病的平均旅行时间在所有来自扩大州的医疗补助患者中减少了 0.9 分钟(-6.2%[CI,-8.9%至-3.5%])。在来自非扩大州的患者中,我们几乎没有发现类似变化的证据。
结果反映了投资者所有的医疗机构中 ED 护理的转变,这限制了结果在其他医院类型中的推广。
在 ACA 医疗补助扩大的第一年,参保状态以及 ED 就诊地点和类型发生了有意义的变化,这表明扩大医疗补助为患者提供了更多选择医院设施的机会。
罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会。