Bakare Olusegun, Akintujoye Ikeoluwa A, Gbemudu Paul E, Mbaezue Rheiner N, Akinbolade Abimbola O, Olopade Segun
Internal Medicine-Pediatrics, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA.
Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Sep 18;15(9):e45464. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45464. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Overutilization of the emergency department (ED) is a significant problem in the United States (US), characterized mainly by patients with non-emergent conditions seeking care in a setting designed specifically for acute care. This has significantly increased healthcare costs in the US, a country with one of the most expensive healthcare systems in the world. ED overutilization was also found to be high among people with Medicaid coverage, especially since the Affordable Care Act was enacted with an expansion in Medicaid coverage. Using the 2018 South Eastern Pennsylvania (SEPA) Household Health Survey, we identified a significant bivariate relationship between emergency department visits and the following predictor variables: sex, race, education, employment status, 150% poverty level, and Medicaid recipient. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, Medicaid recipients had higher odds of presenting to the ED than non-Medicaid recipients [odds ratio (OR): 2.863, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.164, 3.788]. Black people (OR: 1.647, 95% CI: 1.411, 1.923) and Native Americans (OR: 2.985, 95% CI: 1.536, 5.800) had higher odds than Whites. Respondents without a high school diploma had higher odds than college graduates (OR: 1.647, 95% CI: 1.96, 2.273). Respondents below the 150% poverty line had higher odds than those at or above the 150% poverty level (OR: 1.651, 95% CI: 1.386, 1.968). Unemployed respondents had higher odds than full-time employed respondents (OR: 1.703, 95% CI: 1.488, 1.953) or part-time (OR: 1.259, 95% CI: 1.036, 1.529). No difference was observed between the sexes. Addressing ED overutilization should take a multi-faceted approach with the ultimate goal of improving access to primary care.
急诊科过度使用是美国的一个重大问题,主要表现为非紧急情况的患者在专门用于急性护理的环境中寻求治疗。这显著增加了美国的医疗成本,美国是世界上医疗系统最昂贵的国家之一。研究还发现,医疗补助覆盖人群的急诊科过度使用率也很高,尤其是在《平价医疗法案》颁布并扩大了医疗补助覆盖范围之后。利用2018年宾夕法尼亚州东南部(SEPA)家庭健康调查,我们确定了急诊科就诊与以下预测变量之间存在显著的双变量关系:性别、种族、教育程度、就业状况、150%贫困线以及医疗补助领取者。使用多变量逻辑回归模型,医疗补助领取者前往急诊科就诊的几率高于非医疗补助领取者[比值比(OR):2.863,95%置信区间(CI):2.164,3.788]。黑人(OR:1.647,95%CI:1.411,1.923)和美国原住民(OR:2.985,95%CI:1.536,5.800)前往急诊科就诊的几率高于白人。没有高中文凭的受访者前往急诊科就诊的几率高于大学毕业生(OR:1.647,95%CI:1.96,2.273)。低于150%贫困线的受访者前往急诊科就诊的几率高于处于或高于150%贫困线的受访者(OR:1.651,95%CI:1.386,1.968)。失业受访者前往急诊科就诊的几率高于全职就业受访者(OR:1.703,95%CI:1.488,1.953)或兼职受访者(OR:1.259,95%CI:1.036,1.529)。两性之间未观察到差异。解决急诊科过度使用问题应采取多方面的方法,最终目标是改善初级医疗服务的可及性。