Mueller Sabrina, Wilke Thomas, Bechtel Benno, Punekar Yogesh Suresh, Mitzner Karen, Virchow J Christian
IPAM, University of Wismar, Alter Holzhafen 19, 23966 Wismar, Germany.
IPAM, University of Wismar, Alter Holzhafen 19, 23966 Wismar, Germany.
Respir Med. 2017 Jan;122:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
The main objectives of this study, based on a large cohort of German COPD patients, were to assess the level of non-persistence (NP) and non-adherence (NA) with long-acting COPD inhaler treatment and to describe factors that may be associated with NP and NA.
This was a retrospective cohort analysis based on claims data provided by a German statutory health insurance fund (years 2010-2012). NP was analyzed for treatment-naïve patients only; it was defined as a gap of >90 days in medication availability. With regard to NA, first the overall yearly medication possession ratio (MPR) was analyzed, NA was defined as MPR<80%. Secondly, adherence was explored only for the period in which a patient continued therapy with a long-acting COPD agent (no gap>90 days).
45,937 COPD patients who received at least one prescription of any long-acting COPD agent were identified (mean age 71.4 years; 45.2% female). Among these, 22,276 (42.4%) were classified as newly treated. The percentage of NP patients after 12 months was 65.3% on an overall patient level. Agent-specific NP rates were: 58.5% for LABA, 47.9% for LAMA, 78.0% for ICS, and 69.4% for single-device LABA/ICS combination treatment. The overall 12-month MPR across all agent classes on a patient level was 57.9% (70.0% of patients classified as non-adherent). During periods of general treatment continuation, the mean MPR/NA rates were 85.0%/30.1% (patient level across all agents), 89.3%/28.2% (LABA), 92.1%/16.2% (LAMA), 84.2%/43.8% (ICS) and 84.1%/42.8% (LABA/ICS combination). In the Cox regression analyses, several factors like female gender, higher CCI or lower number of specialist' visits were associated with earlier discontinuation of therapy. In comparison to LABA therapy, LAMA therapy was less likely to be associated with early NP, whereas patients who initiated ICS therapy or a single-device LABA/ICS combination therapy faced a higher NP risk.
In German COPD patients, persistence and adherence with respect to long-acting bronchodilator therapy is poor. Approximately two thirds of patients fail to continue treatment after 12 months. In addition, about one third implement their treatment poorly during periods of general therapy continuation.
本研究基于大量德国慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者队列,主要目的是评估长效COPD吸入器治疗的非持续治疗(NP)和不依从治疗(NA)水平,并描述可能与NP和NA相关的因素。
这是一项基于德国法定健康保险基金提供的索赔数据(2010 - 2012年)的回顾性队列分析。仅对初治患者分析NP;其定义为药物供应中断超过90天。关于NA,首先分析总体年度药物持有率(MPR),NA定义为MPR<80%。其次,仅在患者继续使用长效COPD药物治疗期间(无超过90天的中断)探索依从性。
确定了45937例接受过至少一次任何长效COPD药物处方的COPD患者(平均年龄71.4岁;45.2%为女性)。其中,22276例(42.4%)被归类为新治疗患者。在总体患者水平上,12个月后NP患者的百分比为65.3%。特定药物的NP率分别为:长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)为58.5%,长效抗胆碱能药物(LAMA)为47.9%,吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)为78.0%,单装置LABA/ICS联合治疗为69.4%。在患者水平上,所有药物类别的总体12个月MPR为57.9%(70.0%的患者被归类为不依从)。在一般治疗持续期间,平均MPR/NA率分别为85.0%/30.1%(所有药物的患者水平)、89.3%/28.2%(LABA)、92.1%/16.2%(LAMA)、84.2%/43.8%(ICS)和84.1%/42.8%(LABA/ICS联合)。在Cox回归分析中,女性性别、较高的Charlson合并症指数(CCI)或较少的专科就诊次数等几个因素与治疗的早期中断相关。与LABA治疗相比,LAMA治疗与早期NP的关联较小,而开始ICS治疗或单装置LABA/ICS联合治疗的患者面临更高的NP风险。
在德国COPD患者中,长效支气管扩张剂治疗的持续性和依从性较差。约三分之二的患者在12个月后未能继续治疗。此外,在一般治疗持续期间,约三分之一的患者治疗执行情况较差。