Laue Johanna, Melbye Hasse, Halvorsen Peder A, Andreeva Elena A, Godycki-Cwirko Maciek, Wollny Anja, Francis Nick A, Spigt Mark, Kung Kenny, Risør Mette Bech
Department of Community Medicine, General Practice Research Unit, University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Department of Family Medicine, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Dec 8;11:3109-3119. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S118856. eCollection 2016.
To explore the decision-making of general practitioners (GPs) concerning treatment with antibiotics and/or oral corticosteroids and hospitalization for COPD patients with exacerbations.
Thematic analysis of seven focus groups with 53 GPs from urban and rural areas in Norway, Germany, Wales, Poland, Russia, the Netherlands, and Hong Kong.
Four main themes were identified. 1) Dealing with medical uncertainty: the GPs aimed to make clear medical decisions and avoid unnecessary prescriptions and hospitalizations, yet this was challenged by uncertainty regarding the severity of the exacerbations and concerns about overlooking comorbidities. 2) Knowing the patient: contextual knowledge about the individual patient provided a supplementary framework to biomedical knowledge, allowing for more differentiated decision-making. 3) Balancing the patients' perspective: the GPs considered patients' experiential knowledge about their own body and illness as valuable in assisting their decision-making, yet felt that dealing with disagreements between their own and their patients' perceptions concerning the need for treatment or hospitalization could be difficult. 4) Outpatient support and collaboration: both formal and informal caregivers and organizational aspects of the health systems influenced the decision-making, particularly in terms of mitigating potentially severe consequences of "wrong decisions" and concerning the negotiation of responsibilities.
Fear of overlooking severe comorbidity and of further deteriorating symptoms emerged as a main driver of GPs' management decisions. GPs consider a holistic understanding of illness and the patients' own judgment crucial to making reasonable decisions under medical uncertainty. Moreover, GPs' decisions depend on the availability and reliability of other formal and informal carers, and the health care systems' organizational and cultural code of conduct. Strengthening the collaboration between GPs, other outpatient care facilities and the patients' social network can ensure ongoing monitoring and prompt intervention if necessary and may help to improve primary care for COPD patients with exacerbations.
探讨全科医生(GP)对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期患者使用抗生素和/或口服糖皮质激素治疗以及住院治疗的决策情况。
对来自挪威、德国、威尔士、波兰、俄罗斯、荷兰和中国香港城乡地区的53名全科医生进行了7次焦点小组主题分析。
确定了四个主要主题。1)应对医疗不确定性:全科医生旨在做出明确的医疗决策,避免不必要的处方和住院治疗,但这受到急性加重期严重程度的不确定性以及对忽视合并症的担忧的挑战。2)了解患者:关于个体患者的背景知识为生物医学知识提供了补充框架,有助于做出更具差异化的决策。3)平衡患者视角:全科医生认为患者关于自身身体和疾病的经验知识对辅助决策很有价值,但觉得处理自身与患者在治疗或住院需求认知上的分歧可能会很困难。4)门诊支持与协作:正式和非正式护理人员以及卫生系统的组织层面都会影响决策,特别是在减轻“错误决策”可能带来的严重后果以及责任协商方面。
担心忽视严重合并症和症状进一步恶化成为全科医生管理决策的主要驱动因素。全科医生认为在医疗不确定性下,对疾病的全面理解和患者自身的判断对于做出合理决策至关重要。此外,全科医生的决策取决于其他正式和非正式护理人员的可及性和可靠性,以及医疗保健系统的组织和文化行为规范。加强全科医生、其他门诊护理机构与患者社交网络之间的协作,可以确保持续监测并在必要时及时干预,可能有助于改善COPD急性加重期患者的初级护理。