• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从患者角度看全科医学中的共同决策。一项横断面调查。

Shared decision-making in general practice from a patient perspective. A cross-sectional survey.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Research (OPEN), University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Jun;40(2):167-172. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2069700. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1080/02813432.2022.2069700
PMID:35481437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9397466/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess patient involvement in terms of shared decision-making in general practice from the perspectives of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or type 2 diabetes (T2DM) (or both).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) ranging from 0 to 5 (best).

SETTING AND SUBJECTS

Patients diagnosed with either T2DM and/or COPD were asked to focus on their most recent consultation in general practice concerning their T2DM or lung disease. Responders were approached through the Danish Diabetes Association and Danish Lung Association.

RESULTS

The sample included 468 responders. Mean scores for the total sample were between 3.3 and 4.2. The overall mean score for all items was 3.7. The highest overall mean score was for patients with T2DM, whereas the lowest overall mean score was for patients having both T2DM and COPD. Furthermore, we observed a slightly lower overall mean score for women compared to men and for those younger than 65 years compared to those aged 65 years or older.

CONCLUSION

Overall, patients are involved in shared decision-making in general practice Minor nuances were found because patients with COPD were less involved in shared decision-making compared to patients with T2DM. Similarly, younger patients and women were less involved than older patients and men.

摘要

目的

我们旨在从慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者(或两者兼有)的角度评估一般实践中的患者参与度,即共同决策。

设计

使用 9 项共享决策问卷调查(SDM-Q-9)进行的横断面调查,范围从 0 到 5(最佳)。

地点和对象

诊断患有 T2DM 和/或 COPD 的患者被要求关注他们在一般实践中关于 T2DM 或肺部疾病的最近一次就诊。应答者通过丹麦糖尿病协会和丹麦肺协会接触。

结果

该样本包括 468 名应答者。总样本的平均得分为 3.3 到 4.2 之间。所有项目的总体平均得分为 3.7。总体平均得分最高的是患有 T2DM 的患者,而总体平均得分最低的是同时患有 T2DM 和 COPD 的患者。此外,我们观察到女性的总体平均得分略低于男性,而年龄在 65 岁以下的患者的总体平均得分低于 65 岁或以上的患者。

结论

总体而言,患者在一般实践中参与共同决策。由于 COPD 患者的参与程度低于 T2DM 患者,因此存在一些细微差别。同样,年轻患者和女性的参与程度低于老年患者和男性。

相似文献

1
Shared decision-making in general practice from a patient perspective. A cross-sectional survey.从患者角度看全科医学中的共同决策。一项横断面调查。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Jun;40(2):167-172. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2069700. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
A Cross-sectional Survey to Assess Reasons for Therapeutic Inertia in People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Preferred Strategies to Overcome It From the Perspectives of Persons With Diabetes and General/Family Practitioners: Results From the MOTION Study.一项评估 2 型糖尿病患者治疗惰性原因及患者和全科/家庭医生认为可克服该惰性的首选策略的横断面调查:来自 MOTION 研究的结果。
Can J Diabetes. 2022 Jun;46(4):337-345.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
3
Shared decision-making in routine breast cancer care in Germany-A cross-sectional study.德国常规乳腺癌护理中的共同决策——一项横断面研究。
Psychooncology. 2022 Jul;31(7):1120-1126. doi: 10.1002/pon.5898. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
4
Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.用于多发性硬化症共同决策的SDM-Q-9问卷的心理测量特性:项目反应理论建模与验证性因素分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 22;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0656-2.
5
Current status of shared decision making for rheumatoid arthritis treatment in Japan: a web-based survey on physicians and patients.日本类风湿关节炎治疗共同决策的现状:一项针对医生和患者的网络调查
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 May;38(5):853-861. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2050108. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
6
Characteristics of shared decision making in Romania from the patient perspective: A cross-sectional multicentric study.从患者角度看罗马尼亚的共享决策特征:一项跨中心的横断面研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1152-1159. doi: 10.1111/jep.13257. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
7
Shared decision-making in general practice: an observational study comparing 2007 with 2015.全科医学中的共同决策:一项比较 2007 年和 2015 年的观察性研究。
Fam Pract. 2019 May 23;36(3):357-364. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy070.
8
OPADIA Study: Is a Patient Questionnaire Useful for Enhancing Physician-Patient Shared Decision Making on Physical Activity Micro-objectives in Diabetes?OPADIA 研究:患者问卷是否有助于增强医患双方就糖尿病患者身体活动微观目标进行的共同决策?
Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):2317-2336. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01336-8. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
9
Shared decision making in primary care: Process evaluation of the intervention in the OPTIMAL study, a cluster randomised trial.初级保健中的共享决策:干预措施在 OPTIMAL 研究中的过程评估,一项集群随机试验。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Jun;16(3):375-380. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
10
The relationship between evaluation of shared decision-making by pet owners and veterinarians and satisfaction with veterinary consultations.宠物主人和兽医对共同决策评估的关系与兽医咨询满意度之间的关系。
BMC Vet Res. 2022 Aug 2;18(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03401-6.

引用本文的文献

1
General Practitioners' Perceptions of Patient Involvement-An Interview Study.全科医生对患者参与的认知——一项访谈研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70077. doi: 10.1111/jep.70077.
2
Shared decision making applied to self-management program for hypertensive patients: A scoping review protocol.用于高血压患者自我管理计划的共同决策:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0309593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309593. eCollection 2024.
3
How should a general practitioner say no to a patient?全科医生该如何对患者说“不”?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023 Dec;41(4):353-354. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2250398. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Observer Ratings of Shared Decision Making Do Not Match Patient Reports: An Observational Study in 5 Family Medicine Practices.观察者对共享决策的评估与患者报告不符:5 家家庭医学实践中的观察性研究。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Jan;41(1):51-59. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20977885.
2
The Challenges and Opportunities for Shared Decision Making Highlighted by COVID-19.新冠疫情凸显了共同决策面临的挑战和机遇。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Sep;8(8):2474-2480.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
3
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the core functions of primary care: will the cure be worse than the disease? A qualitative interview study in Flemish GPs.COVID-19 大流行对初级保健核心功能的影响:治疗会比疾病更糟糕吗? Flemish 家庭医生的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 17;10(6):e039674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039674.
4
What matters to people with COPD: outputs from Working Together for Change.COPD 患者关心的问题:共创变革的产出。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2019 Apr 12;29(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s41533-019-0124-z.
5
The Relationships Between Use of Quality-of-Care Feedback Reports on Chronic Diseases and Medical Engagement in General Practice.慢性病护理质量反馈报告的使用与全科医疗中的医疗参与度之间的关系
Qual Manag Health Care. 2018 Oct/Dec;27(4):191-198. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000188.
6
Use of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) in intervention studies-A systematic review.在干预研究中使用9项共同决策问卷(SDM-Q-9和SDM-Q-Doc)——一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 30;12(3):e0173904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173904. eCollection 2017.
7
Social disparities in diabetes care: a general population study in Denmark.糖尿病护理中的社会差异:丹麦的一项普通人群研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017 Mar;35(1):54-63. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1288702. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
8
How do general practitioners implement decision-making regarding COPD patients with exacerbations? An international focus group study.全科医生如何对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者进行决策?一项国际焦点小组研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Dec 8;11:3109-3119. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S118856. eCollection 2016.
9
A qualitative study of unmet healthcare needs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A potential role for specialist palliative care?慢性阻塞性肺疾病未满足的医疗需求的定性研究。专科姑息治疗的潜在作用?
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Nov;11(9):1433-8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201404-155BC.
10
Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.比较九项共享决策问卷与 OPTION 量表——尝试建立聚合效度。
Health Expect. 2015 Feb;18(1):137-50. doi: 10.1111/hex.12022. Epub 2012 Nov 26.