Suppr超能文献

心脏植入式电子设备感染的预防:采用聚维酮碘、双层手套、细致的无菌/抗菌措施及抗生素预防的单人操作技术

Prevention of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: Single Operator Technique with Use of Povidone-Iodine, Double Gloving, Meticulous Aseptic/Antiseptic Measures and Antibiotic Prophylaxis.

作者信息

Manolis Antonis S, Melita Helen

机构信息

Third Department of Cardiology, Athens University School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.

Central Laboratories, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;40(1):26-34. doi: 10.1111/pace.12996. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation is complicated by infection still at a worrisome rate of 2-5%. Since early on during device implantation procedures, we have adopted an infection-preventive technique which has hitherto resulted in effective prevention of infections. Herein we present our results of applying this technique by a single operator in a prospective series of 762 consecutive patients undergoing device implantation.

METHODS

A meticulous search for and treatment of active, occult, or smoldering infection was undertaken preoperatively. An aseptic/antiseptic technique was used for implantation of each device. Skin preparation is thorough with initial cleansing performed with alcohol followed by povidone-iodine 10% solution, which is also used in the wound and inside the pocket. In addition, we routinely use double gloving, and IV antibiotic prophylaxis 1 hour before and for 48 hours afterwards followed by oral antibiotic for 2-3 days after discharge. The skin is closed with absorbable sutures. The study includes 382 patients having a new pacemaker (n = 333) or battery change, system upgrade or lead revision (n = 49), and 380 patients having a new implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (n = 296) or device replacement/upgrade/lead revision (n = 84).

RESULTS

The pacemaker group, aged 70.2 ± 16.5 years, includes 18% VVI, 49% DDD, 29% VDD, and 4% cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. The ICD group, aged 61.3 ± 13.0 years, with a mean ejection fraction of 36 ± 13%, includes 325 ICD and 55 CRT implants. Over 26.6 ± 33.4 months for the pacemaker group and 36.6 ± 38.3 months for the ICD group, infection occurred in one patient in each group (0.26%) having a device replacement.

CONCLUSION

A consistent and strict approach of aseptic/antiseptic technique with the use of double gloving and povidone-iodine solution within the pocket plus a 4-day regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis minimizes infections in CIED implants.

摘要

背景

心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)植入术后感染并发症发生率仍高达2%-5%,令人担忧。自设备植入手术早期起,我们就采用了一种感染预防技术,迄今为止已有效预防了感染。在此,我们展示了由一名操作者在762例连续接受设备植入的前瞻性系列患者中应用该技术的结果。

方法

术前对活动性、隐匿性或潜在感染进行细致排查和治疗。每台设备植入均采用无菌/抗菌技术。皮肤准备充分,先用酒精进行初步清洁,再用10%聚维酮碘溶液,伤口及囊袋内部也使用该溶液。此外,我们常规使用双层手套,并在术前1小时及术后48小时静脉给予抗生素预防,出院后口服抗生素2-3天。皮肤用可吸收缝线缝合。该研究包括382例植入新起搏器(n = 333)或更换电池、系统升级或导线修复(n = 49)的患者,以及380例植入新植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)(n = 296)或设备更换/升级/导线修复(n = 84)的患者。

结果

起搏器组患者年龄为70.2±16.5岁,其中VVI起搏器占18%,DDD起搏器占49%,VDD起搏器占29%,心脏再同步治疗(CRT)设备占4%。ICD组患者年龄为61.3±13.0岁,平均射血分数为36±13%,包括325例ICD植入和55例CRT植入。在起搏器组随访26.6±33.4个月、ICD组随访36.6±38.3个月期间,每组各有1例进行设备更换的患者发生感染(0.26%)。

结论

采用一致且严格的无菌/抗菌技术,使用双层手套及囊袋内注入聚维酮碘溶液,并进行为期4天的抗生素预防方案,可将CIED植入术后感染降至最低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验