Manolis Antonis S, Georgiopoulos Georgios, Metaxa Sofia, Koulouris Spyridon, Tsiachris Dimitris
Third Department of Cardiology, Athens University School of Medicine; Athens-Greece.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Oct;18(4):289-295. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads.
This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads.
Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications.
Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia.
我们之前报道过使用廉价工具经皮取出心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)导线的成功方法,多年来一直在持续应用。在此,我们报告系统使用一种独特的探条——导线锁定装置(LLD)的结果,该装置可牢固锁定整个导线腔,并借助无动力伸缩鞘管,对54例患者的98根CIED导线进行了取出操作。
这项前瞻性观察性临床研究纳入了38名男性和16名女性,年龄为68.9±13.1岁,因设备感染(n = 46)、导线故障(n = 5)或在植入除颤器之前(n = 3)而接受导线取出术。导线在位时间为6.7±4.3年。感染更常见于葡萄球菌属(n = 40)。有78根起搏导线(31根心室导线、37根心房导线、4根VDD导线和6根冠状窦导线)以及20根除颤导线。
通过简单牵引(6根导线)以及使用LLD探条(92根导线)并借助伸缩鞘管(15例患者),52例(96.3%)患者中的96根(98%)导线成功取出,除1根导线外均采用锁骨下途径取出;1例患者还需要采用右股静脉途径。2例患者中,1根心室起搏导线和1根除颤导线的远端碎片未能取出。最后,54例患者中98根导线中的96根(98%)导线取出完全成功(52/54)(96.3%)或部分成功(2/54)(3.7%),且无重大并发症。
使用LLD锁定探条并借助无动力伸缩鞘管的机械工具,通过局部麻醉下简化、安全且廉价的操作,经皮取出导线可以成功。