• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全喉切除术后住院时间、再次手术及再入院的预测因素。

Predictors of length of stay, reoperation, and readmission following total laryngectomy.

作者信息

Helman Samuel N, Brant Jason A, Moubayed Sami P, Newman Jason G, Cannady Steven B, Chai Raymond L

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2017 Jun;127(6):1339-1344. doi: 10.1002/lary.26454. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1002/lary.26454
PMID:28000237
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To identify relevant patient and surgical risk factors associated with prolonged length of stay, return to the operating room, and readmission within 30 days following total laryngectomy using the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. Patients undergoing total laryngectomy alone for laryngeal cancer were identified from the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2014.

METHODS

Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors for prolonged length of stay, readmissions, and unplanned reoperations within 30 days.

RESULTS

Among 871 patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, the median length of stay was 8.0 days (range, 0-130 days). Totally dependent functional status (P < .01; odds ratio [OR]: 32.62), Black or African American race (P = .029; OR: 1.75), and operative time (P < .0001; OR: 1.15) were associated with prolonged length of stay. The overall rate of return to the operating room within 30 days was 12.4%. Contaminated wound status (P = .025; OR: 3.53), operative time (P = .015; OR: 1.10), steroid use (P < .01; OR: 2.92), and smoking (P = .05; OR: 1.60) were significantly associated with return to the operating room. Unplanned readmission rate was 11.9%, and 47.37% of readmissions were due to wound infection/pharyngocutaneous fistula. Dirty/contaminated wound classification (P = .05; OR: 22.5) was associated with readmission on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first population-level analysis to be performed on length of stay, readmission, and reoperation for total laryngectomy. Assessing and identifying modifiable risk factors on quality metrics may reduce overall cost and the burden on limited hospital resources.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

  1. Laryngoscope, 127:1339-1344, 2017.
摘要

目的/假设:利用美国外科医师学会国家质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)确定全喉切除术后住院时间延长、返回手术室以及30天内再入院的相关患者和手术风险因素。研究设计:回顾性数据库研究。从2005年至2014年的ACS-NSQIP数据库中识别仅因喉癌接受全喉切除术的患者。

方法

采用多因素逻辑回归确定住院时间延长、再入院以及30天内非计划再次手术的独立预测因素。

结果

在871例符合纳入和排除标准的患者中,中位住院时间为8.0天(范围0 - 130天)。完全依赖功能状态(P < 0.01;比值比[OR]:32.62)、黑人或非裔美国人种族(P = 0.029;OR:1.75)以及手术时间(P < 0.0001;OR:1.15)与住院时间延长相关。30天内返回手术室的总体发生率为12.4%。伤口污染状态(P = 0.025;OR:3.53)、手术时间(P = 0.015;OR:1.10)、使用类固醇(P < 0.01;OR:2.92)以及吸烟(P = 0.05;OR:1.60)与返回手术室显著相关。非计划再入院率为11.9%,47.37%的再入院是由于伤口感染/咽皮肤瘘。在多因素分析中,脏污/污染伤口分类(P = 0.05;OR:22.5)与再入院相关。

结论

这是首次对全喉切除术的住院时间、再入院和再次手术进行的人群水平分析。评估和识别质量指标上的可改变风险因素可能会降低总体成本以及减轻有限医院资源的负担。

证据级别

4。《喉镜》,127:1339 - 1344,2017年。

相似文献

1
Predictors of length of stay, reoperation, and readmission following total laryngectomy.全喉切除术后住院时间、再次手术及再入院的预测因素。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jun;127(6):1339-1344. doi: 10.1002/lary.26454. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
2
Length of hospital stay after craniotomy for tumor: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.肿瘤开颅术后的住院时间:一项国家外科质量改进计划分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E12. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15386.
3
Complications, hospital length of stay, and readmission after total laryngectomy.全喉切除术后的并发症、住院时长及再入院情况。
Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(10):1760-1767. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30483. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
4
Reoperation and readmission after clipping of an unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.未破裂颅内动脉瘤夹闭术后的再次手术和再入院:国家手术质量改进计划分析。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;128(3):756-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161810. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
5
Thirty-day readmission and reoperation after surgery for spinal tumors: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.脊柱肿瘤手术后30天再入院及再次手术:一项国家外科质量改进计划分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Aug;41(2):E5. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16168.
6
Unplanned return to operating room after lower extremity endovascular intervention is an independent predictor for hospital readmission.下肢血管腔内介入治疗后计划外重返手术室是医院再入院的独立预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1735-1744.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.121. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
Readmission and complications within 30 days after intrathecal baclofen pump placement.鞘内巴氯芬泵置入后 30 天内的再入院和并发症。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Oct;60(10):1038-1044. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13730. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
Risk factors for readmission after lower extremity bypass in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program.美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划中下肢旁路手术后再入院的风险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1331-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.032. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
9
Postoperative complications of total laryngectomy in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者全喉切除术后的并发症
Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127(10):2247-2251. doi: 10.1002/lary.26478. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
10
Analysis of 30-day readmission after aortoiliac and infrainguinal revascularization using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set.利用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据集对主髂动脉和股腘动脉血管重建术后30天再入院情况进行分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Nov;60(5):1266-1274. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.051. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Racioethnic disparities in comorbidities and outcomes following head and neck oncologic surgery.头颈部肿瘤手术后合并症及预后的种族差异。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 May 8;11(1):74-85. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.178. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Development and validation of a novel nomogram model for identifying risk of prolonged length of stay among patients receiving free vascularized flap reconstruction of head and neck cancer.一种用于识别接受头颈癌游离血管化皮瓣重建患者住院时间延长风险的新型列线图模型的开发与验证
Front Oncol. 2024 May 2;14:1345766. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1345766. eCollection 2024.
3
Oncological and functional outcome after laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: a population-based analysis in Germany from 2001 to 2020.
喉癌和下咽癌行喉切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局:2001 年至 2020 年德国的一项基于人群的分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 2;14(1):7761. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58423-x.
4
Total laryngectomy and readmission: causes, rates and predictors.全喉切除术和再次入院:原因、发生率和预测因素。
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Dec 20;16(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06645-z.
5
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in head and neck cancer: a matched-pair analysis.头颈部癌症的加速康复外科(ERAS)方案:一项配对分析。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2022 Aug;42(4):325-333. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2072.
6
Head and neck cancer readmission reduction (HANCARRE) project: Reducing 30-day readmissions.头颈癌再入院率降低(HANCARRE)项目:降低30天再入院率。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 May 2;8(2):158-166. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.56. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Surgical wound classification in otolaryngology: A state-of-the-art review.耳鼻喉科手术伤口分类:最新综述。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr 18;8(2):139-144. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.63. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Prolonged inpatient stay after upfront total laryngectomy is associated with overall survival.upfront全喉切除术后住院时间延长与总生存期相关。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan 14;6(1):94-102. doi: 10.1002/lio2.441. eCollection 2021 Feb.
9
Short-Term Morbidity and Predictors of Adverse Events Following Esthesioneuroblastoma Surgery.嗅神经母细胞瘤手术后的短期发病率及不良事件预测因素
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 Jul;35(4):500-506. doi: 10.1177/1945892420970468. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
10
Predicting length of stay in head and neck patients who undergo free flap reconstruction.预测接受游离皮瓣重建的头颈患者的住院时间。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 May 28;5(3):461-467. doi: 10.1002/lio2.410. eCollection 2020 Jun.