• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在阳痿评估中,卡规带检查与多学科评估的比较

Snap-Gauge band vs multidisciplinary evaluation in impotence assessment.

作者信息

Allen J, Ellis D J, Carroll J L, Baltish M R, Bagley D H

机构信息

Department of Urology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Urology. 1989 Oct;34(4):197-9. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90371-3.

DOI:10.1016/0090-4295(89)90371-3
PMID:2800084
Abstract

This study compares the findings of multidisciplinary evaluation to the two-night use of the Snap-Gauge band in 100 impotent men. An organic etiology was diagnosed in 52 percent of those evaluated. The Snap-Gauge band proved accurate as a screening device for organic disease. If no elements were broken over the two-night period, this finding correlated with multisystemic diagnosis of organic etiology in 86 percent of cases. Among the 52 patients in whom an organic etiology was diagnosed, 32 broke no elements for a 62 percent sensitivity. When more than one element was broken, the predictive value as to etiology of the erectile dysfunction diminished.

摘要

本研究将多学科评估结果与100名阳痿男性连续两晚使用Snap-Gauge环的结果进行了比较。在接受评估的患者中,52%被诊断为器质性病因。Snap-Gauge环被证明是一种准确的器质性疾病筛查工具。如果在两晚期间没有元件损坏,这一结果与86%的病例中多系统诊断的器质性病因相关。在52名被诊断为器质性病因的患者中,32名没有元件损坏,敏感性为62%。当有一个以上元件损坏时,对勃起功能障碍病因的预测价值就会降低。

相似文献

1
Snap-Gauge band vs multidisciplinary evaluation in impotence assessment.在阳痿评估中,卡规带检查与多学科评估的比较
Urology. 1989 Oct;34(4):197-9. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90371-3.
2
Snap-Gauge band versus penile rigidity in impotence assessment.用于阳痿评估的卡规带与阴茎硬度
J Urol. 1988 Jul;140(1):61-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41486-8.
3
The use of PotenTest in the multidisciplinary evaluation of impotence: is it a reliable measure? Jefferson Sexual Function Center.PotenTest在阳痿多学科评估中的应用:它是一种可靠的测量方法吗?杰斐逊性功能中心。
J Sex Marital Ther. 1990 Fall;16(3):181-7. doi: 10.1080/00926239008405264.
4
Snap-Gauge band compared to RigiScan Plus in a nocturnal penile tumescence study for evaluation of erectile dysfunction.
Urol Int. 2003;71(1):96-9. doi: 10.1159/000071103.
5
Snap-gauge compared to a full nocturnal penile tumescence study for evaluation of patients with erectile impotence.与全夜阴茎勃起功能研究相比,卡规用于评估勃起功能障碍患者。
J Urol. 1990 Jan;143(1):51-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39862-2.
6
Screening assessment of penile tumescence and rigidity. Clinical test of Snap-Gauge.阴茎勃起度和硬度的筛查评估。Snap-Gauge临床测试。
Urology. 1987 Mar;29(3):254-7. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(87)90064-1.
7
New techniques in evaluation of impotence.阳痿评估的新技术
Urology. 1987 Apr;29(4):383-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(87)90501-2.
8
Utility of Rigiscan and papaverine in diagnosis of erectile impotence.阴茎硬度测试仪和罂粟碱在勃起功能障碍诊断中的应用
Urology. 1988 Jun;31(6):526-9. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(88)90225-7.
9
Evaluation of erectile dysfunction with continuous monitoring of penile rigidity.通过持续监测阴茎硬度评估勃起功能障碍。
J Urol. 1986 Nov;136(5):1026-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45195-0.
10
Incidence of erectile impotence secondary to transurethral resection of benign prostatic hyperplasia, assessed by preoperative and postoperative Snap Gauge tests.
J Urol. 1995 May;153(5):1491-3.