Suppr超能文献

健康成年人中五项常用执行任务的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of five frequently used executive tasks in healthy adults.

作者信息

Soveri Anna, Lehtonen Minna, Karlsson Linda C, Lukasik Karolina, Antfolk Jan, Laine Matti

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Åbo Akademi University , Turku , Finland.

b Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Cognitive Science, Institute of Behavioural Sciences , University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland.

出版信息

Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2018 Mar-Apr;25(2):155-165. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2016.1263795. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Abstract

Executive tasks are important instruments for neuropsychological and cognitive research, but only a limited number of studies have investigated the test-retest reliability of these tasks. Such information is needed for optimizing task usage, for example, in longitudinal and intervention studies. In this study with healthy adults, we investigated the temporal stability of five executive tasks: the Simon task, a visuoverbal N-back task, a visuospatial N-back task, a running memory task, and the Number-letter task. These five tasks are frequently used in research, but previously published reliability data is very limited or totally lacking. The results from the present study showed considerable variability with the highest test-retest reliabilities amongst the three working memory tasks. Furthermore, reaction time measures indicated practice effects between the two sessions across the tasks. The present results set constraints to the interpretation of the results of longitudinal and intervention studies using these tasks.

摘要

执行任务是神经心理学和认知研究的重要工具,但仅有有限的研究调查过这些任务的重测信度。例如,在纵向研究和干预研究中,优化任务使用就需要此类信息。在这项针对健康成年人的研究中,我们调查了五项执行任务的时间稳定性:西蒙任务、视觉语言n-back任务、视觉空间n-back任务、连续记忆任务和数字-字母任务。这五项任务在研究中经常使用,但之前发表的信度数据非常有限或完全没有。本研究结果显示,三项工作记忆任务的重测信度最高,但存在相当大的变异性。此外,反应时间测量表明,各任务在两次测试之间存在练习效应。本研究结果对使用这些任务的纵向研究和干预研究结果的解释设置了限制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验