Kerr Gail S, Swearingen Christopher, Mikuls Ted R, Yazici Yusuf
From the *Rheumatology Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC); and †Division of Rheumatology, Georgetown and Howard University Hospitals, Washington, DC; ‡Department of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY; and §VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System and Nebraska Arthritis Outcomes Research Center; and ∥Division of Rheumatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
J Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Jan;23(1):12-18. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000472.
In the United States, there is racial/ethnic disparity in the care of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), yet there are limited data regarding the impact of varied health care systems on treatment outcomes.
The aim fo this study was to compare the frequencies of use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in racial minorities with RA in a single-payer and variable-access health systems.
Rheumatoid arthritis disease status was examined in the Ethnic Minority Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium (EMRAC) and Veterans Affairs Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry (VARA); frequencies of prednisone and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agent use at enrollment were documented. Comparisons in frequencies of RA therapies between RA cohorts and white and nonwhite racial subsets were evaluated.
The combined cohorts provided 2899 subjects for analysis (EMRAC = 943, VARA = 1956). Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 and Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints scores were equivalent (cohort, racial subsets), as was biologic agent use (26% vs. 28%) between whites and nonwhites. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use was greater in EMRAC nonwhites compared with their white counterparts, but similar to all VARA patients (33% vs. 22% [P < 0.001], 36%, 39%, respectively). However, biologic agent use was significantly greater in EMRAC versus VARA patients (37% vs. 22%, P < 0.001). In VARA patients, there was no difference in biologic agent use among racial subsets (22% vs. 21%). In EMRAC patients, biologic agent use was greater in whites than in nonwhites (EMRAC white 45% vs. EMRAC nonwhite 33%, P < 0.001; odds ratio, 1.66) and compared with all VARA subjects (EMRAC white 45% vs. all VARA 22%, P < 0.001; odds ratio, 2.91). Younger age, advanced education, longstanding disease, and severe disease were associated with biologic agent use.
When compared with more variable-access systems, a VA system of care that includes a single-payer insurance may afford equality in use of biologic agents among different racial subsets.
在美国,类风湿关节炎(RA)的治疗存在种族/族裔差异,但关于不同医疗保健系统对治疗结果影响的数据有限。
本研究旨在比较单一支付方和不同获取途径的医疗系统中,患有RA的少数族裔使用改善病情抗风湿药物和生物制剂的频率。
在少数族裔类风湿关节炎联盟(EMRAC)和退伍军人事务部类风湿关节炎登记处(VARA)中检查类风湿关节炎疾病状态;记录入组时泼尼松、改善病情抗风湿药物和生物制剂的使用频率。评估RA队列与白人和非白人种族亚组之间RA治疗频率的比较。
合并队列提供了2899名受试者进行分析(EMRAC = 943,VARA = 1956)。患者指数数据3的常规评估和28个关节的疾病活动评分在队列、种族亚组中相当,白人和非白人之间的生物制剂使用情况也是如此(26%对28%)。与白人相比,EMRAC中的非白人使用改善病情抗风湿药物的比例更高,但与所有VARA患者相似(分别为33%对22% [P < 0.001],36%,39%)。然而,EMRAC患者使用生物制剂的比例明显高于VARA患者(37%对22%,P < 0.001)。在VARA患者中,不同种族亚组之间的生物制剂使用没有差异(22%对21%)。在EMRAC患者中,白人使用生物制剂的比例高于非白人(EMRAC白人45%对EMRAC非白人33%,P < 0.001;优势比,1.66),且与所有VARA受试者相比(EMRAC白人45%对所有VARA 22%,P < 0.001;优势比,2.91)。年龄较小、教育程度较高、病程较长和病情较重与生物制剂的使用有关。
与更多不同获取途径的系统相比,包括单一支付方保险的退伍军人事务部医疗系统可能在不同种族亚组间生物制剂的使用上实现平等。