Tan Timothy L, Kheir Michael M, Tan Dean D, Parvizi Javad
1The Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Dec 21;98(24):2082-2088. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01450.
The treatment outcomes of periprosthetic joint infection are frequently dependent on characteristics of the causative organism. The objective of this comparative study was to investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for development of polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection, and the outcome of surgical treatment of these patients.
All patients with polymicrobial, monomicrobial, or culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection treated from 2000 to 2014 were identified at a single institution. Ninety-five patients with a polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. We matched patients with a polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection with the other cohorts using propensity score matching for several important parameters. Treatment success was defined according to the Delphi criteria; Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were generated to demonstrate this. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for a polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection.
Overall, 10.3% (108 of 1,045) of the periprosthetic joint infections treated at our institution were polymicrobial in nature. Patients with a polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection had a higher failure rate at 50.5% (48 of 95) compared with the monomicrobial periprosthetic joint infection cohort at 31.5% (63 of 200) and the culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection cohort at 30.2% (48 of 159) (p = 0.003). The survivorship of the polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection group was 52.2% at the 2-year follow-up, 49.3% at the 5-year follow-up, and 46.8% at the 10-year follow-up. Patients with polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection had a higher rate of amputation (odds ratio [OR], 3.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.34 to 10.80]), arthrodesis (OR, 11.06 [95% CI, 1.27 to 96.00]), and periprosthetic joint infection-related mortality (OR, 7.88 [95% CI, 1.60 to 38.67]) compared with patients with monomicrobial periprosthetic joint infection. Isolation of gram-negative organisms (p < 0.01), enterococci (p < 0.01), Escherichia coli (p < 0.01), and atypical organisms (p < 0.01) was associated with polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection. Only the presence of a sinus tract (OR, 2.20 [95% CI, 1.39 to 3.47]; p = 0.001) was a significant risk factor for polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection on multivariate analysis.
This study reveals that polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection, occurring at a relatively low rate, is associated with poor outcomes when compared with monomicrobial and culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection. Patients with polymicrobial infections were more likely to require a salvage procedure or to have periprosthetic joint infection-related mortality. Polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection was associated with soft-tissue defects such as a sinus tract and certain types of organisms, which should be considered when administering antibiotics to these patients.
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
人工关节周围感染的治疗结果通常取决于致病微生物的特征。本比较研究的目的是调查多重微生物人工关节周围感染的发生率、危险因素以及这些患者的手术治疗结果。
在单一机构中识别出2000年至2014年期间接受治疗的所有多重微生物、单一微生物或培养阴性的人工关节周围感染患者。95例多重微生物人工关节周围感染患者的随访时间至少为12个月。我们使用倾向得分匹配法,针对几个重要参数,将多重微生物人工关节周围感染患者与其他队列进行匹配。治疗成功的定义依据德尔菲标准;绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线以证明这一点。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以确定多重微生物人工关节周围感染的危险因素。
总体而言,在我们机构接受治疗的人工关节周围感染中,10.3%(1045例中的108例)本质上为多重微生物感染。多重微生物人工关节周围感染患者的失败率为50.5%(95例中的48例),高于单一微生物人工关节周围感染队列的31.5%(200例中的63例)和培养阴性人工关节周围感染队列的30.2%(159例中的48例)(p = 0.003)。多重微生物人工关节周围感染组在2年随访时的生存率为52.2%,5年随访时为49.3%,10年随访时为46.8%。与单一微生物人工关节周围感染患者相比,多重微生物人工关节周围感染患者的截肢率(比值比[OR],3.80[95%置信区间(CI),1.34至10.80])、关节融合率(OR,11.06[95%CI,1.27至96.00])以及人工关节周围感染相关死亡率(OR,7.88[95%CI,1.60至38.67])更高。革兰氏阴性菌(p < 0.01)、肠球菌(p < 0.01)、大肠杆菌(p < 0.01)和非典型微生物(p < 0.01)的分离与多重微生物人工关节周围感染相关。在多因素分析中,仅存在窦道(OR,2.20[95%CI,1.39至3.47];p = 0.001)是多重微生物人工关节周围感染的显著危险因素。
本研究表明,多重微生物人工关节周围感染发生率相对较低,与单一微生物和培养阴性人工关节周围感染相比,预后较差。多重微生物感染患者更有可能需要挽救性手术或发生人工关节周围感染相关死亡。多重微生物人工关节周围感染与软组织缺损(如窦道)和某些类型的微生物有关,在对这些患者使用抗生素时应予以考虑。
预后性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者须知。