Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;52(2):122-127. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096735. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
The health benefits of physical activity (PA) have been extensively documented. Globally PA levels are low with only a small proportion of the population reaching recommended levels. Insufficient PA is seen as a major public health problem with high cost to society. Physiotherapists work with people to manage long-term conditions and are well placed to deliver individual interventions to increase PA. Despite this, little is known about the evidence that exists in this field.
This scoping review comprises a comprehensive search of key databases using predetermined search terms. This is supplemented with a parallel search that incorporated novel social media strands. In line with current guidance, a robust screening process took place using agreed inclusion and exclusion criteria.
31 studies met the inclusion criteria. The number of studies published annually increased over the decade. Ireland and USA yielded the largest number of publications with only 1 study from the UK. The target populations included physiotherapists and service users from a range of clinical populations. The studies were mainly quantitative and observational in design with a predominance of studies that scoped attitudes, perceptions, barriers and current practice.
This reconnaissance has shown the state of the evidence to be sparse and disparate. However, the sharp rise in published work in recent years is encouraging. The predominance of scoping studies and the clear social, economic and political drivers for change in this area highlights a need for more pragmatic, interventional studies that can inform clinical practice.
身体活动(PA)对健康的益处已得到广泛证实。全球范围内,身体活动水平较低,只有一小部分人达到了推荐水平。身体活动不足被视为一个主要的公共卫生问题,给社会带来了高昂的成本。物理治疗师与患者一起管理长期疾病,并且非常适合进行个人干预以增加身体活动。尽管如此,对于这一领域的现有证据知之甚少。
本范围综述包括使用预定搜索词对主要数据库进行全面搜索。此外,还采用了一种新的社交媒体线索的平行搜索。根据当前的指导,使用商定的纳入和排除标准进行了稳健的筛选过程。
31 项研究符合纳入标准。每年发表的研究数量在这十年中有所增加。爱尔兰和美国发表的论文数量最多,而英国只有 1 项研究。目标人群包括来自各种临床人群的物理治疗师和服务使用者。这些研究主要是定量和观察性设计,主要研究范围是态度、看法、障碍和当前实践。
这项调查表明,证据的状况稀少且分散。然而,近年来发表的工作数量急剧增加令人鼓舞。范围研究的盛行以及该领域在社会、经济和政治方面推动变革的明显驱动因素,凸显了需要进行更实用、干预性的研究,以为临床实践提供信息。