Dean Lauren R, Baker Stuart N
Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Apr 1;117(4):1713-1719. doi: 10.1152/jn.01009.2015. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
Movements in response to acoustically startling cues have shorter reaction times than those following less intense sounds; this is known as the StartReact effect. The neural underpinnings for StartReact are unclear. One possibility is that startling cues preferentially invoke the reticulospinal tract to convey motor commands to spinal motoneurons. Reticulospinal outputs are highly divergent, controlling large groups of muscles in synergistic patterns. By contrast the dominant pathway in primate voluntary movement is the corticospinal tract, which can access small groups of muscles selectively. We therefore hypothesized that StartReact responses would be less fractionated than standard voluntary reactions. Electromyogram recordings were made from 15 muscles in 10 healthy human subjects as they carried out 32 varied movements with the right forelimb in response to startling and nonstartling auditory cues. Movements were chosen to elicit a wide range of muscle activations. Multidimensional muscle activity patterns were calculated at delays from 0 to 100 ms after the onset of muscle activity and subjected to principal component analysis to assess fractionation. In all cases, a similar proportion of the total variance could be explained by a reduced number of principal components for the startling and the nonstartling cue. Muscle activity patterns for a given task were very similar in response to startling and nonstartling cues. This suggests that movements produced in the StartReact paradigm rely on similar contributions from different descending pathways as those following voluntary responses to nonstartling cues. We demonstrate that the ability to activate muscles selectively is preserved during the very rapid reactions produced following a startling cue. This suggests that the contributions from different descending pathways are comparable between these rapid reactions and more typical voluntary movements.
对听觉惊吓线索做出的反应动作,其反应时间比那些对强度较低声音做出的反应动作要短;这被称为惊吓反应效应。惊吓反应的神经基础尚不清楚。一种可能性是,惊吓线索优先激活网状脊髓束,以将运动指令传递给脊髓运动神经元。网状脊髓束的输出高度分散,以协同模式控制大量肌肉群。相比之下,灵长类动物自主运动的主要通路是皮质脊髓束,它可以选择性地支配小肌肉群。因此,我们假设惊吓反应的动作比标准的自主反应动作的分离程度更低。在10名健康人类受试者执行32种不同的右前肢动作以响应惊吓和非惊吓听觉线索时,记录了15块肌肉的肌电图。选择这些动作是为了引发广泛的肌肉激活。在肌肉活动开始后0到100毫秒的延迟时间内计算多维肌肉活动模式,并进行主成分分析以评估分离程度。在所有情况下,对于惊吓线索和非惊吓线索,总方差的相似比例可以由减少数量的主成分来解释。对于给定任务,对惊吓和非惊吓线索的肌肉活动模式非常相似。这表明,在惊吓反应范式中产生的动作,与对非惊吓线索的自主反应动作一样,依赖于不同下行通路的相似贡献。我们证明,在惊吓线索后产生的非常快速的反应过程中,选择性激活肌肉的能力得以保留。这表明,在这些快速反应和更典型的自主运动之间,不同下行通路的贡献是相当的。