Tomeh Abdulhameed, Yusof Khan Abdul Hanif Khan, Abu Zaid Zalina, Ling King-Hwa, Inche Mat Liyana Najwa, Basri Hamidon, Wan Sulaiman Wan Aliaa
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Malaysian Research Institute on Ageing (MyAgeingTM), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2025 Mar 13;18:498-511. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.03.005. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Poor reproducibility and high inter-individual variability in responses to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) of the human motor cortex (M1) are matters of concern. Here we recruited 17 healthy young adults in a randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-elicited motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured pre-iTBS (T0) and post-iTBS at 4-7 (T1), 9-12 (T2), 17-20 (T3), and 27-30 minutes (T4) from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. MEP grand average (MEPGA) was defined as the mean of the normalized-to-baseline MEPs at all timepoints post-iTBS. As secondary objectives, we measured blood pressure, heart rate, and capillary blood glucose pre-iTBS, and at 0 and 30 minutes post-iTBS. The TMSens_Q structured questionnaire was filled out at the end of each session. Two-way repeated ANOVA did not show a significant TIME×INTERVENTION interaction effect on MEP amplitude, MEP latency, blood pressure, heart rate, and blood glucose (p > 0.05). Sleepiness was the most reported TMSens_Q sensation (82.3 %) in both groups. Surprisingly, the subjects' height negatively correlated with the normalized MEP amplitudes at T3 (r = -0.65, p = 0.005), T4 (r = -0.66, p = 0.004), and MEPGA (r = -0.68, p = 0.003), with a trend correlation at T1 (r = -0.46, p = 0.062) and T2 (r = -0.46, p = 0.065) in the active but not sham group. In view of this, we urge future studies to delve deeper into the influence of height on neuroplasticity induction of the M1 representation of peripheral muscles. In the end, we highlight unique methodological considerations in our study protocol and future recommendations for M1-iTBS studies.
对人类运动皮层(M1)进行间歇性theta爆发刺激(iTBS)时,重复性差以及个体间反应差异大是令人担忧的问题。在此,我们招募了17名健康的年轻成年人,进行一项随机、假刺激对照、交叉研究。在右侧第一背侧骨间肌,于iTBS前(T0)以及iTBS后4 - 7分钟(T1)、9 - 12分钟(T2)、17 - 20分钟(T3)和27 - 30分钟(T4)测量经颅磁刺激(TMS)诱发的运动诱发电位(MEP)。MEP总体平均值(MEPGA)定义为iTBS后所有时间点相对于基线的MEP的平均值。作为次要目标,我们在iTBS前、iTBS后0分钟和30分钟测量血压、心率和毛细血管血糖。在每个疗程结束时填写TMSens_Q结构化问卷。双向重复方差分析未显示TIME×INTERVENTION交互作用对MEP幅度、MEP潜伏期、血压、心率和血糖有显著影响(p>0.05)。嗜睡是两组中报告最多的TMSens_Q感觉(82.3%)。令人惊讶的是,在活跃组而非假刺激组中,受试者的身高与T3(r = -0.65,p = 0.005)、T4(r = -0.66,p = 0.004)和MEPGA(r = -0.68,p = 0.003)时的标准化MEP幅度呈负相关,在T1(r = -0.46,p = 0.062)和T2(r = -0.46,p = 0.065)时有趋势相关性。鉴于此,我们敦促未来的研究更深入地探究身高对外周肌肉M1代表区神经可塑性诱导的影响。最后,我们强调了我们研究方案中独特的方法学考虑因素以及对M1 - iTBS研究的未来建议。