• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Home ranges, habitat and body mass: simple correlates of home range size in ungulates.活动范围、栖息地与体重:有蹄类动物活动范围大小的简单相关因素
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Dec 28;283(1845). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1234.
2
Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection.移动是连接家园范围和栖息地选择的纽带。
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):21-31. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12394. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
3
Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses.有蹄类动物的性别隔离:三种假说的比较检验。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 Feb;77(1):77-96. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005814.
4
Reconciling competing ecological explanations for sexual segregation in ungulates.协调有蹄类动物性别隔离的相互竞争的生态学解释。
Ecology. 2008 Mar;89(3):693-704. doi: 10.1890/07-0645.1.
5
The origins of sexual dimorphism in body size in ungulates.有蹄类动物体型两性差异的起源。
Evolution. 2002 Jun;56(6):1276-85. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01438.x.
6
Effects of the physical and social environment on flight response and habitat use in a solitary ungulate, the Japanese serow (Capricornis crispus).物理和社会环境对独居有蹄类动物日本鬣羚(Capricornis crispus)飞行反应及栖息地利用的影响。
Behav Processes. 2019 Jan;158:228-233. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
7
Both social and ecological factors predict ungulate brain size.社会因素和生态因素都能预测有蹄类动物的脑容量。
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 22;273(1583):207-15. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3283.
8
Woodland features determining home range size of roe deer.决定狍子活动范围大小的林地特征。
Behav Processes. 2017 Jul;140:115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
9
Social organization in ungulates: Revisiting Jarman's hypotheses.反刍动物的社会组织:重新审视贾尔曼的假说。
J Evol Biol. 2021 Apr;34(4):604-613. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13782. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
Home is where the shell is: predicting turtle home range sizes.家即壳所在之处:预测海龟的活动范围大小。
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):106-14. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12446. Epub 2015 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Traces of phylogeny and ecology in hippocampal neuron numbers.海马神经元数量中的系统发育和生态学痕迹。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Aug 13;4(9):pgaf261. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf261. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Uncovering multiple influences on space use by deer mice using large ecological networks.利用大型生态网络揭示鹿鼠对空间利用的多种影响因素。
Oecologia. 2025 Jun 4;207(7):98. doi: 10.1007/s00442-025-05731-2.
3
Distribution range and human-hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibious) conflict in the Lake Tana biosphere reserve, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚塔纳湖生物圈保护区内的分布范围及人类与河马(两栖河马)的冲突
BMC Zool. 2025 May 23;10(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40850-025-00231-5.
4
Megafauna mobility: Assessing the foraging range of an extinct macropodid from central eastern Queensland, Australia.巨型动物的移动性:评估澳大利亚昆士兰州中东部一种已灭绝的大袋鼠科动物的觅食范围。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 23;20(4):e0319712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319712. eCollection 2025.
5
Enamel carbon, oxygen, and strontium isotopes reveal limited mobility in an extinct rhinoceros at Ashfall Fossil Beds, Nebraska, USA.牙釉质中的碳、氧和锶同位素显示,美国内布拉斯加州阿什福尔化石床的一种已灭绝犀牛的活动范围有限。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 4;15(1):11651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94263-z.
6
Intraspecific scaling of home range size and its bioenergetic association.巢域大小的种内尺度缩放及其生物能量学关联。
Ecology. 2025 Feb;106(2):e70003. doi: 10.1002/ecy.70003.
7
Neonatal antipredator tactics shape female movement patterns in large herbivores.新生动物的反捕食策略塑造了大型食草动物的雌性活动模式。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Jan;9(1):142-152. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02565-8. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
8
Home range in genus : from polygons to Brownian bridges of scabietic and healthy Iberian ibexes ().该属的活动范围:从疥癣病伊比利亚野山羊和健康伊比利亚野山羊的多边形到布朗桥()。 (注:原文括号内内容缺失,翻译时保留原样)
J Mammal. 2024 Feb 27;105(3):621-632. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyae013. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Mitochondrial Genomic Evidence of Selective Constraints in Small-Bodied Terrestrial Cetartiodactyla.小型陆生鲸偶蹄目的选择性限制的线粒体基因组证据
Animals (Basel). 2024 May 10;14(10):1434. doi: 10.3390/ani14101434.
10
Individuals of a group-living shorebird show smaller home range overlap when food availability is low.群居滨鸟群体中的个体在食物供应不足时,其活动范围的重叠程度较小。
Mov Ecol. 2023 Oct 27;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40462-023-00427-9.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of season, sex and feeding style on home range area versus body mass scaling in temperate ruminants.季节、性别和采食方式对温带反刍动物家域面积与体重缩放关系的影响。
Oecologia. 2001 Mar;127(1):30-39. doi: 10.1007/s004420000562. Epub 2001 Mar 1.
2
Home range scaling: intraspecific and comparative trends.家域缩放:种内及比较趋势
Oecologia. 1991 Sep;87(3):343-348. doi: 10.1007/BF00634589.
3
Energy and the Scaling of Animal Space Use.能量与动物空间利用的尺度关系
Am Nat. 2015 Aug;186(2):196-211. doi: 10.1086/682070. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
4
Spatial scale and movement behaviour traits control the impacts of habitat fragmentation on individual fitness.空间尺度和运动行为特征控制着栖息地破碎化对个体适合度的影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):168-77. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12427. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
5
Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection.移动是连接家园范围和栖息地选择的纽带。
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):21-31. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12394. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
6
The functional response predicts the effect of resource distribution on the optimal movement rate of consumers.功能反应预测了资源分布对消费者最佳移动速度的影响。
Ecol Lett. 2014 Dec;17(12):1570-9. doi: 10.1111/ele.12379. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
7
'You shall not pass!': quantifying barrier permeability and proximity avoidance by animals.“你不得通过!”:量化动物的屏障通透性和近距回避行为
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):43-53. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12275. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
8
Selection, use, choice and occupancy: clarifying concepts in resource selection studies.选择、使用、选择和占用:资源选择研究中概念的澄清。
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Nov;82(6):1183-91. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12141.
9
How optimal foragers should respond to habitat changes: a reanalysis of the Marginal Value Theorem.最佳觅食者应如何应对栖息地变化:对边际价值定理的重新分析
J Math Biol. 2014 Nov;69(5):1237-65. doi: 10.1007/s00285-013-0734-y. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
10
Moose (Alces alces) reacts to high summer temperatures by utilizing thermal shelters in boreal forests - an analysis based on airborne laser scanning of the canopy structure at moose locations.驼鹿(Alces alces)通过利用北方森林中的避暑地来应对夏季高温——这是基于驼鹿栖息地树冠结构的航空激光扫描进行的分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Apr;20(4):1115-25. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12405. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

活动范围、栖息地与体重:有蹄类动物活动范围大小的简单相关因素

Home ranges, habitat and body mass: simple correlates of home range size in ungulates.

作者信息

Ofstad Endre Grüner, Herfindal Ivar, Solberg Erling Johan, Sæther Bernt-Erik

机构信息

Department of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway

Department of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Dec 28;283(1845). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1234.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2016.1234
PMID:28003441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5204158/
Abstract

The spatial scale of animal space use, e.g. measured as individual home range size, is a key trait with important implications for ecological and evolutionary processes as well as management and conservation of populations and ecosystems. Explaining variation in home range size has therefore received great attention in ecological research. However, few studies have examined multiple hypotheses simultaneously, which is important provided the complex interactions between life history, social system and behaviour. Here, we review previous studies on home range size in ungulates, supplementing with a meta-analysis, to assess how differences in habitat use and species characteristics affect the relationship between body mass and home range size. Habitat type was the main factor explaining interspecific differences in home range size after accounting for species body mass and group size. Species using open habitats had larger home ranges for a given body mass than species using closed habitats, whereas species in open habitats showed a much weaker allometric relationship compared with species living in closed habitats. We found no support for relationships between home range size and species diet or mating system, or any sexual differences. These patterns suggest that the spatial scale of animal movement mainly is a combined effect of body mass, group size and the landscape structure. Accordingly, landscape management must acknowledge the influence of spatial distribution of habitat types on animal behaviour to ensure natural processes affecting demography and viability of ungulate populations.

摘要

动物空间利用的空间尺度,例如以个体家域大小来衡量,是一个关键特征,对生态和进化过程以及种群和生态系统的管理与保护具有重要意义。因此,解释家域大小的变化在生态学研究中受到了极大关注。然而,很少有研究同时检验多个假设,鉴于生活史、社会系统和行为之间存在复杂的相互作用,这一点很重要。在这里,我们回顾了以往关于有蹄类动物家域大小的研究,并辅以荟萃分析,以评估栖息地利用和物种特征的差异如何影响体重与家域大小之间的关系。在考虑物种体重和群体大小之后,栖息地类型是解释家域大小种间差异的主要因素。对于给定体重的物种,使用开阔栖息地的物种比使用封闭栖息地的物种具有更大的家域,而与生活在封闭栖息地的物种相比,开阔栖息地的物种异速生长关系要弱得多。我们没有发现家域大小与物种饮食或交配系统之间存在关系,也没有发现任何性别差异。这些模式表明,动物运动的空间尺度主要是体重、群体大小和景观结构共同作用的结果。因此,景观管理必须认识到栖息地类型的空间分布对动物行为的影响,以确保影响有蹄类种群数量和生存能力的自然过程。