Russo R, Della Rotonda G, Cautiero F, Ciccarelli M, Maiotti M, Massoni C, Di Pietto F, Zappia M
Orthopedic and Traumatology Unit, Pellegrini Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Sport Traumatology Unit, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Musculoskelet Surg. 2017 Apr;101(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s12306-016-0446-8. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
The treatment of chronic anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss is still debated. The purpose of this study is to compare short-term results of two techniques treating chronic shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone loss: bone block according to open Latarjet-Patte procedure and arthroscopic Bankart repair in association with subscapularis augmentation.
Ninety-one patients with moderate anterior glenoid bone loss underwent from 2011 to 2015. From these patients, two groups of 20 individuals each have been selected. The groups were homogeneous in terms of age, gender, dominance and glenoid bone loss. In group A, an open Latarjet procedure has been performed, and in group B, an arthroscopic Bankart repair associated with subscapularis augmentation has been performed. The mean follow-up in group A was 21 months (20-39 months), while in group B was 20 months (15-36 months). QuickDash score, Constant and Rowe shoulder scores, were used for evaluations of results.
The mean preoperative rate of QuickDash score was 3.6 for group A and 4.0 for group B; Rowe Score was 50.0 for group A and 50.0 for group B. Preoperative mean Constant score was 56.2 for Latarjet-Patte and 55.2 for Bankart plus ASA. Postoperative mean QuickDash score was in group A 1.8 and 1.7 in group B; Rowe Score was 89.8 and 91.6; Constant Score was 93.3 and 93.8. No complications related to surgery have been observed for both procedures. Not statistically significant difference was reported between the two groups (p > .05). Postoperatively, the mean deficit of external rotation in ER1 was -9° in group A and -8 in group B; In ER2, the mean deficit was -5° in both groups (p = .0942).
Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation of Bankart repair is an effective procedure for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss without any significant difference in comparison with the well-known open Latarjet procedure.
对于存在关节盂骨缺损的慢性肩关节前向不稳的治疗仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较两种治疗存在中度关节盂骨缺损的慢性肩关节不稳技术的短期结果:根据开放Latarjet - Patte手术进行的骨块移植以及关节镜下Bankart修复联合肩胛下肌增强术。
2011年至2015年期间,91例存在中度关节盂前侧骨缺损的患者接受了治疗。从这些患者中,每组选取20例个体。两组在年龄、性别、利手和关节盂骨缺损方面具有同质性。A组进行了开放Latarjet手术,B组进行了关节镜下Bankart修复联合肩胛下肌增强术。A组的平均随访时间为21个月(20 - 39个月),而B组为20个月(15 - 36个月)。使用QuickDash评分、Constant和Rowe肩关节评分来评估结果。
A组术前QuickDash评分的平均率为3.6,B组为4.0;Rowe评分A组为50.0,B组为50.0。术前Latarjet - Patte组的平均Constant评分为56.2,Bankart加ASA组为55.2。术后A组QuickDash评分的平均值为1.8,B组为1.7;Rowe评分分别为89.8和91.6;Constant评分分别为93.3和93.8。两种手术均未观察到与手术相关的并发症。两组之间差异无统计学意义(p >.05)。术后,A组在ER1中外旋的平均缺失为 - 9°,B组为 - 8°;在ER2中,两组的平均缺失均为 - 5°(p =.0942)。
关节镜下Bankart修复联合肩胛下肌增强术是治疗存在关节盂骨缺损的复发性肩关节前向不稳的有效方法,与著名的开放Latarjet手术相比无显著差异。