Rupp Marco-Christopher, Rutledge Joan C, Quinn Patrick M, Millett Peter J
The Steadman Philippon Research Institute, 181 West Meadows Drive, Suite 400, Vail, CO, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Hospital Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2023 Apr;16(4):123-144. doi: 10.1007/s12178-023-09822-6. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
Shoulder instability in patients with underlying joint hyperlaxity can be challenging to treat. Poorly defined terminology, heterogeneous treatments, and sparse reports on clinical outcomes impair the development of best practices in this patient population. This article provides a review of the current literature regarding optimal management of patients suffering from shoulder instability with concomitant hyperlaxity of the shoulder, from isolated shoulder joint hyperlaxity to congenital hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD).
Current research shows specialized physiotherapy protocols focused on strengthening of periscapular muscles and improvement of sensorimotor control are a promising non-surgical therapeutic avenue in certain patients, which can be augmented by device-based intervention in select cases. If surgical treatment is warranted, arthroscopic techniques such as pancapsular shift or plication continue to demonstrate favorable outcomes and are currently considered the benchmark for success. The long-term success of more recent innovations such as coracoid process transfers, conjoint tendon transfers, subscapularis tendon augmentation, and capsular reconstruction remains unproven. For patients affected by connective tissue disorders, treatment success is generally less predictable, and the entire array of non-operative and operative interventions needs to be considered to achieve the best patient-specific treatment results. In the treatment of shoulder instability and concomitant hyperlaxity, specialized physiotherapy protocols augmented by device-based interventions have emerged as powerful, non-operative treatment options for select patients. Successful surgical approaches have been demonstrated to comprehensively address capsular redundancy, labral lesions, and incompetence of additional passive stabilizers in a patient-specific fashion, respective of the underlying connective tissue constitution.
对于存在潜在关节过度松弛的患者,肩部不稳定的治疗颇具挑战性。术语定义不明确、治疗方法各异以及临床结果报告稀少,都阻碍了针对这一患者群体制定最佳治疗方案。本文综述了当前有关肩部不稳定合并肩部过度松弛患者最佳管理的文献,范围涵盖从单纯肩关节过度松弛到先天性活动过度谱系障碍(HSD)。
当前研究表明,专注于强化肩胛周围肌肉和改善感觉运动控制的专业物理治疗方案,对于某些患者而言是一种有前景的非手术治疗途径,在特定情况下可通过基于设备的干预加以增强。如果需要进行手术治疗,诸如全关节囊移位或折叠等关节镜技术仍显示出良好效果,目前被视为成功的标准。诸如喙突转移、联合肌腱转移、肩胛下肌腱增强和关节囊重建等最新创新技术的长期成功率尚未得到证实。对于受结缔组织疾病影响的患者,治疗成功通常较难预测,需要综合考虑所有非手术和手术干预措施,以实现针对患者个体的最佳治疗效果。在治疗肩部不稳定合并过度松弛时,辅以基于设备干预的专业物理治疗方案已成为部分患者有力的非手术治疗选择。已证实成功的手术方法能够根据患者个体情况,分别针对关节囊冗余、盂唇损伤以及其他被动稳定结构功能不全等问题进行全面处理,而不考虑潜在的结缔组织构成情况。