• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的质量指标的健康信息技术仪表盘的可用性评估与实施

Usability Evaluation and Implementation of a Health Information Technology Dashboard of Evidence-Based Quality Indicators.

作者信息

Schall Mark Christopher, Cullen Laura, Pennathur Priyadarshini, Chen Howard, Burrell Keith, Matthews Grace

机构信息

Author Affiliations: Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Alabama (Dr Schall); Department of Nursing Services and Patient Care, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (Dr Cullen); Departments of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (Dr Pennathur) and Occupational and Environmental Health (Mr Chen), University of Iowa; and Health Care Information Systems (Mr Burrell) and Department of Nursing Services and Patient Care (Ms Matthews), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City.

出版信息

Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Jun;35(6):281-288. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000325.

DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000325
PMID:28005564
Abstract

Health information technology dashboards that integrate evidence-based quality indicators can efficiently and accurately display patient risk information to promote early intervention and improve overall quality of patient care. We describe the process of developing, evaluating, and implementing a dashboard designed to promote quality care through display of evidence-based quality indicators within an electronic health record. Clinician feedback was sought throughout the process. Usability evaluations were provided by three nurse pairs and one physician from medical-surgical areas. Task completion times, error rates, and ratings of system usability were collected to compare the use of quality indicators displayed on the dashboard to the indicators displayed in a conventional electronic health record across eight experimental scenarios. Participants rated the dashboard as "highly usable" following System Usability Scale (mean, 87.5 [SD, 9.6]) and Poststudy System Usability Questionnaire (mean, 1.7 [SD, 0.5]) criteria. Use of the dashboard led to reduced task completion times and error rates in comparison to the conventional electronic health record for quality indicator-related tasks. Clinician responses to the dashboard display capabilities were positive, and a multifaceted implementation plan has been used. Results suggest application of the dashboard in the care environment may lead to improved patient care.

摘要

整合基于证据的质量指标的健康信息技术仪表板能够高效且准确地展示患者风险信息,以促进早期干预并提高患者护理的整体质量。我们描述了一个仪表板的开发、评估和实施过程,该仪表板旨在通过在电子健康记录中展示基于证据的质量指标来促进优质护理。在整个过程中征求了临床医生的反馈意见。来自内科和外科领域的三对护士和一名医生进行了可用性评估。收集了任务完成时间、错误率和系统可用性评级,以比较在八个实验场景中仪表板上显示的质量指标与传统电子健康记录中显示的指标的使用情况。根据系统可用性量表(平均值为87.5[标准差为9.6])和研究后系统可用性问卷(平均值为1.7[标准差为0.5])的标准,参与者将该仪表板评为“高度可用”。与传统电子健康记录相比,使用该仪表板可减少与质量指标相关任务的任务完成时间和错误率。临床医生对仪表板显示功能的反应是积极的,并且已经采用了多方面的实施计划。结果表明,在护理环境中应用该仪表板可能会改善患者护理。

相似文献

1
Usability Evaluation and Implementation of a Health Information Technology Dashboard of Evidence-Based Quality Indicators.基于证据的质量指标的健康信息技术仪表盘的可用性评估与实施
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Jun;35(6):281-288. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000325.
2
Usability Evaluation of a Dashboard for Home Care Nurses.居家护理护士仪表盘的可用性评估
Comput Inform Nurs. 2019 Jan;37(1):11-19. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000484.
3
Usability Testing a Potentially Inappropriate Medication Dashboard: A Core Component of the Dashboard Development Process.对潜在不适当用药仪表板进行可用性测试:仪表板开发过程的核心组成部分。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Aug;11(4):528-534. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714693. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
4
The informatics nurse specialist role in electronic health record usability evaluation.信息学护士专家在电子健康记录可用性评估中的角色。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2014 May;32(5):214-20. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000042.
5
Usability Testing of an Interactive Dashboard for Surgical Quality Improvement in a Large Congenital Heart Center.大型先心病中心用于外科质量改进的交互式仪表板的可用性测试。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Oct;10(5):859-869. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1698466. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
The Solutions in Health Analytics for Rural Equity Across the Northwest (SHARE-NW) Dashboard for Health Equity in Rural Public Health: Usability Evaluation.健康分析解决方案助力西北农村公平(SHARE-NW)农村公共卫生公平仪表板:可用性评估。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jun 5;11:e51666. doi: 10.2196/51666.
7
A Patient-Facing Diabetes Dashboard Embedded in a Patient Web Portal: Design Sprint and Usability Testing.嵌入患者门户网站的面向患者的糖尿病信息仪表板:设计冲刺与可用性测试
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Sep 24;5(3):e26. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.9569.
8
A diabetes dashboard and physician efficiency and accuracy in accessing data needed for high-quality diabetes care.糖尿病数据仪表盘与医生获取高质量糖尿病护理所需数据的效率和准确性。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;9(5):398-405. doi: 10.1370/afm.1286.
9
From Information Management to Information Visualization: Development of Radiology Dashboards.从信息管理到信息可视化:放射学仪表板的发展
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 May 11;7(2):308-29. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-08-RA-0104. eCollection 2016.
10
Use, Perceived Usability, and Barriers to Implementation of a Patient Safety Dashboard Integrated within a Vendor EHR.患者安全仪表板在供应商电子健康记录中的使用、感知可用性和实施障碍。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Jan;11(1):34-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402756. Epub 2020 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A Usability Survey of a Quality Improvement Data Visualization Tool Among Medical Intensive Care Unit Nurses.医学重症监护病房护士对质量改进数据可视化工具的可用性调查
ACI open. 2024 Jan;8(1):e33-e42. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1782604. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
Impact of Implementing Electronic Nursing Records on Quality and Safety Indicators in Care.电子护理记录对护理质量和安全指标的影响。
Libyan J Med. 2024 Dec 31;19(1):2421625. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2024.2421625. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
3
Toward Guidelines for Designing Holistic Integrated Information Visualizations for Time-Critical Contexts: Systematic Review.
面向时间关键型情境的整体综合信息可视化设计指南:系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 20;26:e58088. doi: 10.2196/58088.
4
Engaging Multidisciplinary Clinical Users in the Design of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Graphical User Interface for Intensive Care Unit Instability Decision Support.让多学科临床用户参与设计人工智能驱动的 ICU 不稳定决策支持图形用户界面。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):789-802. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775565. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
5
Involving Health Care Professionals in the Development of Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review.让医疗保健专业人员参与电子健康记录的开发:范围审查
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jul 10;10:e45598. doi: 10.2196/45598.
6
Usability Evaluation of Dashboards: A Systematic Literature Review of Tools.仪表盘的可用性评估:工具的系统文献回顾
Biomed Res Int. 2023 Feb 22;2023:9990933. doi: 10.1155/2023/9990933. eCollection 2023.
7
A Systematic Review of Electronic Medical Record Driven Quality Measurement and Feedback Systems.电子病历驱动的质量测量和反馈系统的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):200. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010200.
8
Toward a Learning Health Care System: A Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Conceptual Framework for Implementation of Clinical Analytics in a Digital Hospital.迈向学习型医疗保健系统:数字医院中临床分析实施的系统评价与循证概念框架
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Mar;13(2):339-354. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743243. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
9
State-of-the-art Dashboards on Clinical Indicator Data to Support Reflection on Practice: Scoping Review.用于支持实践反思的临床指标数据的先进仪表盘:范围审查
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 14;10(2):e32695. doi: 10.2196/32695.
10
Exploring the Intersection Between Health Professionals' Learning and eHealth Data: Protocol for a Comprehensive Research Program in Practice Analytics in Health Care.探索健康专业人员学习与电子健康数据之间的交叉点:医疗保健实践分析综合研究计划方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Dec 9;10(12):e27984. doi: 10.2196/27984.