Schreiber Annia, DI Marco Fabiano, Braido Fulvio, Solidoro Paolo
Respiratory Intensive Care Unit and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, Pavia, Italy -
Unit of Pneumology, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Minerva Med. 2016 Dec;107(6 Suppl 1):14-20.
After a planned extubation, the re-occurrence of acute respiratory distress needing the restoration of invasive mechanical support is a severe phenomenon associated with several important consequences, including increased morbidity, Intensive Care Unit mortality, and an enormous financial burden. So far, the most commonly used techniques to ameliorate gas exchange in the postextubation period were low-flow oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). High flows through nasal cannulae (HFNC) is a system which allows increased CO2 wash-out of anatomical dead space, positive nasopharyngeal pressure, a relatively constant FiO2, and an improvement of mucociliary function. In a recently published paper by Hernandez et al. HFNC therapy, compared in the postextubation period to standard oxygen in patients at low risk of re-intubation, was associated with a lower re-intubation rate within 72 hours of extubation, with no evidence of any delays in re-intubation which may prove fatal, as previously reported in the context of NIV. Despite yielding some useful starting points and positive results with HFNC, some discrepancies have emerged in the findings of the studies in this field. As we await further more homogeneous and enlightening studies, at present we can only affirm that HFNC seems to be a useful means to prevent and treat postextubation hypoxemia. In fact no harmful or adverse effects related to HFNC emerged in any of the studies and globally, it was associated with better comfort and tolerance compared with NIV, which justifies its use as a first alternative to standard oxygen therapy.
在计划拔管后,再次出现需要恢复有创机械通气支持的急性呼吸窘迫是一种严重现象,会带来一些重要后果,包括发病率增加、重症监护病房死亡率上升以及巨大的经济负担。到目前为止,拔管后改善气体交换最常用的技术是低流量氧疗和无创通气(NIV)。高流量鼻导管(HFNC)系统可增加对解剖死腔的二氧化碳清除、产生正性鼻咽压力、维持相对恒定的吸入氧分数(FiO2)并改善黏液纤毛功能。在埃尔南德斯等人最近发表的一篇论文中,对于再插管低风险患者,在拔管后将HFNC治疗与标准氧疗进行比较,结果显示拔管后72小时内再插管率较低,且没有出现如先前在无创通气背景下报道的可能致命的再插管延迟情况。尽管HFNC取得了一些有用的起始点和积极结果,但该领域研究结果仍存在一些差异。在等待进一步更统一且有启发性的研究之际,目前我们只能肯定HFNC似乎是预防和治疗拔管后低氧血症的一种有用手段。事实上,在任何研究中均未出现与HFNC相关的有害或不良影响,总体而言,与无创通气相比,它具有更好的舒适度和耐受性,这证明了其作为标准氧疗首选替代方法的合理性。