Tinius Alexander, Patrick Russell Anthony
University of Calgary, Department of Biological Sciences, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4.
J Morphol. 2017 Feb;278(2):150-169. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20625. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
The form of amniote claws has been extensively investigated, often with inferences about ecological association being drawn from studies of their geometry. Various methods have been used to quantify differences in the geometry of claws, but rarely have the underlying assumptions of such methods been addressed. Here, we use one set of bird claws and apply six methods (five that have been previously used, and a new one) that are tasked with comparing their shape. In doing so, we compare the (1) ability of these methods to represent the shape of the claw; (2) validity of the assumptions made about underlying claw geometry; (3) their ability to be applied unambiguously; and (4) their ability to differentiate between predetermined functional clusters. We find that of the six methods considered only the geometric morphometric approach reveals differences in the shapes of bird claws. Our comparison shows that geometry-based methods can provide a general estimate of the degree of curvature of claw arcs, but are unable to differentiate between shapes. Of all of the geometry-based approaches, we conclude that the adjusted version of the Zani (2000) method is the most useful because it can be applied without ambiguity, and provides a reliable estimate of claw curvature. The three landmarks that define that method (tip and base of the claw arc, plus the intersection between said claw arc and a line drawn perpendicular from the midpoint of tip and claw base) do not all bear biological significance, but relatively clearly circumscribe the length-to-height ratio of the claw, which relates to its curvature. Overall, our comparisons reveal that the shape of avian claws does not differ significantly between climbing and perching birds, and that the utilization of preordained functional clusters in comparative data analysis can hinder the discovery of meaningful differences in claw shape. J. Morphol. 278:150-169, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals,Inc.
羊膜动物爪子的形态已经得到了广泛研究,人们常常从爪子几何形状的研究中推断其与生态的关联。已经使用了各种方法来量化爪子几何形状的差异,但很少有人探讨这些方法的潜在假设。在这里,我们使用一组鸟类爪子,并应用六种方法(五种先前已使用的方法和一种新方法)来比较它们的形状。在此过程中,我们比较了:(1)这些方法表示爪子形状的能力;(2)关于爪子潜在几何形状假设的有效性;(3)它们明确应用的能力;(4)它们区分预定功能组的能力。我们发现,在所考虑的六种方法中,只有几何形态测量方法揭示了鸟类爪子形状的差异。我们比较发现,基于几何的方法可以提供爪子弧度曲率程度的一般估计,但无法区分形状。在所有基于几何的方法中,我们得出结论,扎尼(2000年)方法的调整版本最有用,因为它可以明确应用,并提供可靠的爪子曲率估计。定义该方法的三个地标(爪子弧度的尖端和基部,加上所述爪子弧度与从尖端和爪子基部中点引出的垂直线交点)并非都具有生物学意义,但相对清晰地界定了爪子的长宽比,这与其曲率相关。总体而言,我们的比较表明,攀缘鸟类和栖息鸟类的爪子形状没有显著差异,并且在比较数据分析中使用预定的功能组会阻碍发现爪子形状中有意义的差异。《形态学杂志》278:150 - 169,2017年。©2016威利期刊公司