Suppr超能文献

与大剂量环磷酰胺相比,改良CVAD和改良CBAD用于多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血干细胞动员的研究

Modified CVAD and modified CBAD compared to high-dose cyclophosphamide for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.

作者信息

Gettys Suzanne C, Gulbis Alison, Wilhelm Kaci, Sasaki Koji, Dinh Yvonne, Rondon Gabriela, Qazilbash Muzaffar H

机构信息

Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

McKesson Corporation, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Haematol. 2017 Apr;98(4):388-392. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12843. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal regimen for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) has not been established. Experience at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center suggests in addition to single-agent cyclophosphamide (Cy), modified cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (mCVAD), and modified cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (mCBAD) may be successful chemomobilization regimens.

METHODS

This retrospective review included 167 patients (66 with Cy, 74 with mCVAD, and 27 with mCBAD) with multiple myeloma undergoing mobilization for auto-HCT between January 1, 2006 and September 30, 2013. The primary objective was to evaluate and compare the successful mobilization of CD34+ cells among high-dose Cy, mCVAD or mCBAD.

RESULTS

Successful mobilization (≥2×10 CD34+ cells/kg) was achieved in all patients, while 65 (98%), 72 (97%), and 27 (100%) patients achieved an optimal mobilization (≥4×10 CD34+ cells/kg) in the Cy, mCVAD, and mCBAD groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the number of apheresis sessions (P=.63), incidence of febrile neutropenia (P=.57), or hospital admission rates (P=.55).

CONCLUSION

Either Cy, mCVAD, or mCBAD can yield successful PBSC mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing auto-HCT.

摘要

背景

对于接受自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HCT)的多发性骨髓瘤患者,外周血干细胞(PBSC)动员的最佳方案尚未确定。德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心的经验表明,除了单药环磷酰胺(Cy)外,改良的环磷酰胺、长春新碱、阿霉素和地塞米松(mCVAD)以及改良的环磷酰胺、硼替佐米、阿霉素和地塞米松(mCBAD)可能是成功的化学动员方案。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2006年1月1日至2013年9月30日期间167例接受auto-HCT动员的多发性骨髓瘤患者(66例使用Cy,74例使用mCVAD,27例使用mCBAD)。主要目的是评估和比较高剂量Cy、mCVAD或mCBAD方案中CD34+细胞的成功动员情况。

结果

所有患者均成功动员(≥2×10 CD34+细胞/kg),而Cy组、mCVAD组和mCBAD组分别有65例(98%)、72例(97%)和27例(100%)患者实现了最佳动员(≥4×10 CD34+细胞/kg)。采集次数(P = 0.63)、发热性中性粒细胞减少症发生率(P = 0.57)或住院率(P = 0.55)方面无显著差异。

结论

对于接受auto-HCT的多发性骨髓瘤患者,Cy、mCVAD或mCBAD均可成功实现PBSC动员。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验