Winkelmann Nils, Desole Max, Hilgendorf Inken, Ernst Thomas, Sayer Herbert G, Kunert Christa, Mügge Lars-Olof, Hochhaus Andreas, Scholl Sebastian
Klinik für Innere Medizin II (Abteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie), Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Germany.
HELIOS Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;142(12):2603-2610. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2270-9. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
Even in the era of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs, the autologous stem cell transplantation after high-dose melphalan continues to represent a standard approach for myeloma patients in first-line therapy. Different mobilization chemotherapies before stem cell apheresis have been published while cyclophosphamide at a dose level of up to 4 g/m has been evaluated and is commonly applied. In contrast, lower dose levels of cyclophosphamide (e.g., 1.5 g/m) did not result in a sufficient collection of stem cells.
We retrospectively analyzed the impact of "intermediate-dose" (ID-CY, 2.5 g/m) versus "high-dose" (HD-CY, 4 g/m) cyclophosphamide in 101 (48 vs. 53) consecutively evaluable myeloma patients (median age 59 years, range 32-72 years) who underwent stem cell mobilization after induction chemotherapy. Successful stem cell harvest was defined as a stem cell yield of at least 5 million CD34 cells per kg bodyweight. Evaluation of toxicity especially considered infectious complications and hematological toxicity in both subgroups.
Successful stem cell mobilization was achieved in 40 of 48 (83 %) and 44 of 53 (83 %) patients, respectively. The median time to apheresis (11 vs. 12 days) and the median CD34 content of stem cell harvest (8.3 vs. 7.6 million CD34 cells per kg bodyweight) did not differ significantly between both groups. There was a significant difference of WBC nadir in favor of the cyclophosphamide regimen with 2.5 g/m (0.8 vs. 0.3 Gpt/L, p = 0.021), and neutropenic fever was more often observed in patients who received 4 g/m cyclophosphamide (34 vs. 15 %, p = 0.078). Importantly, after induction chemotherapy using the VCD regimen (bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone), successful stem cell mobilization was achieved in 26 of 29 (90 %) patients treated with 2.5 g/m and 21 of 25 (84 %) patients receiving 4 g/m cyclophosphamide, respectively.
ID-CY is safe and highly effective for stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma and associated with a reduced toxicity compared to HD-CY.
即使在蛋白酶体抑制剂和免疫调节药物的时代,大剂量美法仑后的自体干细胞移植仍是骨髓瘤患者一线治疗的标准方法。干细胞采集前不同的动员化疗方案已被发表,其中环磷酰胺剂量高达4g/m²已得到评估并被广泛应用。相比之下,较低剂量的环磷酰胺(如1.5g/m²)并不能充分采集到干细胞。
我们回顾性分析了101例(48例 vs. 53例)连续可评估的骨髓瘤患者(中位年龄59岁,范围32 - 72岁)在诱导化疗后接受干细胞动员时,“中剂量”(ID-CY,2.5g/m²)与“高剂量”(HD-CY,4g/m²)环磷酰胺的影响。成功的干细胞采集定义为每千克体重至少采集到500万个CD34细胞。毒性评估特别考虑了两个亚组中的感染并发症和血液学毒性。
分别在48例患者中的40例(83%)和53例患者中的44例(83%)成功实现了干细胞动员。两组之间的采集时间中位数(11天 vs. 12天)和干细胞采集物中CD34含量中位数(每千克体重830万个 vs. 760万个CD34细胞)无显著差异。白细胞最低点有显著差异,2.5g/m²环磷酰胺方案更优(0.8 vs. 0.3Gpt/L,p = 0.021),接受4g/m²环磷酰胺的患者中性粒细胞减少性发热更常见(34% vs. 15%,p = 0.078)。重要的是,在使用VCD方案(硼替佐米、环磷酰胺、地塞米松)进行诱导化疗后,接受2.5g/m²环磷酰胺治疗的29例患者中的26例(90%)和接受4g/m²环磷酰胺治疗的25例患者中的21例(84%)成功实现了干细胞动员。
ID-CY对新诊断的骨髓瘤患者进行干细胞动员是安全且高效的,与HD-CY相比毒性降低。