Cain Megan, Stephenson Matthew, Umapathysivam Kandiah, Williams Nicole, Ianunzio Jamie
1Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 2Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 3Orthopedic and Trauma Service, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, Australia.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Dec;14(12):14-24. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002935.
The objective of this review is to synthesize the best available evidence on the use of percutaneous epiphysiodesis for the management of pediatric leg length discrepancies (LLDs). The effectiveness of four different percutaneous epiphysiodesis techniques will be compared, including transphyseal screws (percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws), physeal drilling and curettage, physeal stapling and guided growth with eight-Plates.Specific review questions to be addressed include.
本综述的目的是综合关于经皮骨骺阻滞术用于治疗小儿肢体长度差异(LLD)的现有最佳证据。将比较四种不同经皮骨骺阻滞术的有效性,包括经骨骺螺钉(使用经骨骺螺钉的经皮骨骺阻滞术)、骨骺钻孔和刮除术、骨骺钉合术以及使用八孔钢板引导生长。有待解决的具体综述问题包括。