Moore Lynne, Evans David, Hameed Sayed M, Yanchar Natalie L, Stelfox Henry T, Simons Richard, Kortbeek John, Bourgeois Gilles, Clément Julien, Lauzier François, Nathens Avery, Turgeon Alexis F
*Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada †Axe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé (Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit), Traumatologie - Urgence - Soins intensifs (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Université Laval, Québec, Canada ‡Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada §Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada ¶Department of Critical Care Medicine, Medicine and Community Health Sciences (HTS), Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada ||Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery and Division of Critical Care, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada **Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), Québec, Canada ††Department of Surgery, Université Laval, Québec, Canada ‡‡Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada §§Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):212-217. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001614.
To measure the variation in trauma center mortality across Canadian trauma systems, assess the contribution of traumatic brain injury and thoracoabdominal injury to observed variations, and evaluate whether the presence of recommended trauma system components is associated with mortality.
Injuries represent one of the leading causes of mortality, disability, and health care costs worldwide. Trauma systems have improved injury outcomes, but the impact of trauma system configuration on mortality is unknown.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults admitted for major injury to trauma centers across Canada (2006-2012). Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate risk-adjusted hospital mortality and assess the impact of 13 recommended trauma system components.
Of 78,807 patients, 8382 (10.6%) died in hospital including 6516 (78%) after severe traumatic brain injury and 749 (9%) after severe thoracoabdominal injury. Risk-adjusted mortality varied from 7.0% to 14.2% across provinces (P < 0.0001); 11.1% to 26.0% for severe traumatic brain injury (P < 0.0001), and 4.7% to 5.9% for thoracoabdominal injury (P = 0.2). Mortality decreased with increasing number of recommended trauma system elements; adjusted odds ratio = 0.93 (0.87-0.99).
We observed significant variation in trauma center mortality across Canadian provinces, specifically for severe traumatic brain injury. Provinces with more recommended trauma system components had better patient survival. Results suggest that trauma system configuration may be an important determinant of injury mortality. A better understanding of which system processes drive optimal outcomes is required to reduce the burden of injury worldwide.
测量加拿大各创伤系统中创伤中心死亡率的差异,评估创伤性脑损伤和胸腹损伤对观察到的差异的影响,并评估推荐的创伤系统组成部分的存在是否与死亡率相关。
损伤是全球范围内导致死亡、残疾和医疗费用的主要原因之一。创伤系统改善了损伤结局,但创伤系统配置对死亡率的影响尚不清楚。
我们对加拿大各创伤中心收治的成年重伤患者(2006 - 2012年)进行了一项回顾性队列研究。采用多水平逻辑回归来估计风险调整后的医院死亡率,并评估13个推荐的创伤系统组成部分的影响。
在78807例患者中,8382例(10.6%)在医院死亡,其中6516例(78%)死于严重创伤性脑损伤,749例(9%)死于严重胸腹损伤。各省风险调整后的死亡率从7.0%到14.2%不等(P < 0.0001);严重创伤性脑损伤的死亡率为11.1%至26.0%(P < 0.0001),胸腹损伤的死亡率为4.7%至5.9%(P = 0.2)。死亡率随着推荐的创伤系统要素数量的增加而降低;调整后的优势比 = 0.93(0.87 - 0.99)。
我们观察到加拿大各省创伤中心死亡率存在显著差异,特别是严重创伤性脑损伤。拥有更多推荐的创伤系统组成部分的省份患者生存率更高。结果表明,创伤系统配置可能是损伤死亡率的一个重要决定因素。需要更好地了解哪些系统流程能带来最佳结果,以减轻全球的损伤负担。