Norton Taylor W, Zhou Michael, Rupp Kelsey, Wang Michele, Paxton Rebecca, Rehman Nisha, He Jack C
Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, United States of America.
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Feb 23;18:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.02.009. eCollection 2024 Mar.
In attempt to increase trauma system coverage, our state added 21 level 3 (L3TC) and level 4 trauma centers (L4TC) to the existing 7 level 1 trauma centers from 2008 to 2012. This study examined the impact of adding these lower-level trauma centers (LLTC) on patient outcomes.
Patients in the state trauma registry age ≥ 15 from 2007 to 2012 were queried for demographic, injury, and outcome variables. These were compared between 2007 (PRE) and 2008-2012 (POST) cohorts. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess independent predictors of mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed for Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥15, age ≥ 65, and trauma mechanisms.
143,919 adults were evaluated. POST had significantly more female, geriatric, and blunt traumas (all < 0.001). ISS was similar. Interfacility transfers increased by 10.2 %. Overall mortality decreased by 0.6 % (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that being in POST was not associated with survival (OR: 1.07, CI: 0.96-1.18, = 0.227). Subgroup analyses showed small reductions in mortality, except for geriatric patients. After adjusting for covariates, POST was not associated with survival in any subgroup, and trended toward being a predictor for death in penetrating traumas (OR: 1.23; 1.00-1.53, = 0.059).
Unregulated proliferation of LLTCs was associated with increased interfacility transfers without significant increase in trauma patients treated. LLTC proliferation was not an independent protector against mortality in the overall cohort and may worsen mortality for penetrating trauma patients. Rather than simply increasing the number of LLTCs within a region, perhaps more planned approaches are needed.
This is, to our knowledge, the first work to study the effect of rapid lower level trauma center proliferation on patient outcomes. The findings of our analysis have implications for strategic planning of future trauma systems.
为扩大创伤系统覆盖范围,我们所在的州于2008年至2012年期间,在现有的7家一级创伤中心基础上,新增了21家三级(L3TC)和四级创伤中心(L4TC)。本研究探讨了新增这些较低级别创伤中心(LLTC)对患者治疗结果的影响。
查询2007年至2012年州创伤登记处中年龄≥15岁患者的人口统计学、损伤及治疗结果变量。对2007年(之前)和2008 - 2012年(之后)队列进行比较。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以评估死亡的独立预测因素。对损伤严重程度评分(ISS)≥15、年龄≥65岁以及创伤机制进行亚组分析。
共评估了143,919名成年人。“之后”队列中女性、老年患者及钝性创伤患者显著增多(均P < 0.001)。ISS相似。机构间转运增加了10.2%。总体死亡率下降了0.6%(P < 0.001)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,处于“之后”队列与生存无关(比值比:1.07,可信区间:0.96 - 1.18,P = 0.227)。亚组分析显示,除老年患者外,死亡率有小幅下降。在对协变量进行校正后,“之后”队列在任何亚组中均与生存无关,在穿透性创伤中甚至有死亡预测趋势(比值比:1.23;1.00 - 1.53,P = 0.059)。
LLTC的无节制增加与机构间转运增加相关,而接受治疗的创伤患者数量未显著增加。LLTC的增加并非总体队列死亡率的独立保护因素,可能会使穿透性创伤患者的死亡率恶化。或许需要的是更具规划性的方法,而非简单地在一个地区增加LLTC的数量。
据我们所知,这是第一项研究快速增加较低级别创伤中心对患者治疗结果影响的工作。我们的分析结果对未来创伤系统的战略规划具有启示意义。