Suppr超能文献

产前诊所的产前诊断信息。女性的经历。

Information on prenatal diagnosis at the antenatal clinic. The women's experiences.

作者信息

Sjögren B, Marsk L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Sjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68(1):35-40. doi: 10.3109/00016348909087686.

Abstract

The issue of information and autonomy (informed consent) in prenatal diagnosis (PND) was studied by questionnaires given to women undergoing amniocentesis (group A, n = 122) or chorionic villus biopsy (group V, n = 90). About 1/4 of the women were also interviewed. Sixty-eight percent of the women had learnt most about PND already before visiting the antenatal clinic. More women in group A (75%) than in group V (51%) were satisfied with the information given at the clinic, probably because amniocentesis is a well-known routine, while chorionic villus biopsy is not. Further, in both groups, more of the women who underwent PND because of age were satisfied with the information than those having PND because of strong fear of giving birth to a handicapped baby. This might be explained by the complicated character of this fear, which the medical staff could not always understand and meet. Also the women who were investigated because of a known genetic problem seemed to need more specialized genetic counselling. Fifty-eight percent of the women were well informed about the risk of giving birth to a child with a congenital disorder and 83% about which disorders could be detected by the procedure they were undergoing. Seventy-three percent had not felt any uneasiness when they were offered PND by their midwife or gynecologist; 18% had initiated the discussion themselves. Seventy-four percent of the women recommended that the medical staff actively offered PND. Most women (87%) answered that the midwife's or gynecologist's attitude towards PND had been positive. The majority (85%) considered that there is a risk of persuasion in counselling.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

通过对接受羊膜穿刺术的女性(A组,n = 122)或绒毛取样的女性(V组,n = 90)进行问卷调查,研究了产前诊断(PND)中的信息与自主权(知情同意)问题。约四分之一的女性还接受了访谈。68%的女性在前往产前诊所之前就已经对PND有了较多了解。A组中对诊所提供的信息感到满意的女性(75%)多于V组(51%),这可能是因为羊膜穿刺术是一种广为人知的常规检查,而绒毛取样则不然。此外,在两组中,因年龄接受PND的女性比因强烈担心生下残疾婴儿而接受PND的女性对信息更满意。这可能是由于这种担心的复杂性,医护人员并不总能理解和应对。因已知遗传问题接受调查的女性似乎也需要更专业的遗传咨询。58%的女性充分了解生下先天性疾病患儿的风险,83%的女性了解她们所接受的检查能够检测出哪些疾病。73%的女性在助产士或妇科医生向她们提供PND时没有感到任何不安;18%的女性自己发起了讨论。74%的女性建议医护人员积极提供PND。大多数女性(87%)回答说,助产士或妇科医生对PND的态度是积极的。大多数人(85%)认为咨询过程中存在劝说的风险。(摘要截选于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验