Crozier Andrew, Blazevic Bojan, Lamata Pablo, Plank Gernot, Ginks Matthew, Duckett Simon, Sohal Manav, Shetty Anoop, Rinaldi Christopher A, Razavi Reza, Niederer Steven A, Smith Nicolas P
Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Institute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Harrachgasse 21/IV, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Europace. 2016 Dec;18(suppl 4):iv113-iv120. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw366.
The efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is known to vary considerably with pacing location, however the most effective set of metrics by which to select the optimal pacing site is not yet well understood. Computational modelling offers a powerful methodology to comprehensively test the effect of pacing location in silico and investigate how to best optimize therapy using clinically available metrics for the individual patient.
Personalized computational models of cardiac electromechanics were used to perform an in silico left ventricle (LV) pacing site optimization study as part of biventricular CRT in three patient cases. Maps of response to therapy according to changes in total activation time (ΔTAT) and acute haemodynamic response (AHR) were generated and compared with preclinical metrics of electrical function, strain, stress, and mechanical work to assess their suitability for selecting the optimal pacing site. In all three patients, response to therapy was highly sensitive to pacing location, with laterobasal locations being optimal. ΔTAT and AHR were found to be correlated (ρ < -0.80), as were AHR and the preclinical activation time at the pacing site (ρ ≥ 0.73), however pacing in the last activated site did not result in the optimal response to therapy in all cases.
This computational modelling study supports pacing in laterobasal locations, optimizing pacing site by minimizing paced QRS duration and pacing in regions activated late at sinus rhythm. Results demonstrate information content is redundant using multiple preclinical metrics. Of significance, the correlation of AHR with ΔTAT indicates that minimization of QRSd is a promising metric for optimization of lead placement.
已知心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的疗效会因起搏位置的不同而有很大差异,然而,用于选择最佳起搏部位的最有效指标组合尚未得到充分理解。计算建模提供了一种强大的方法,可在计算机上全面测试起搏位置的影响,并研究如何利用针对个体患者的临床可用指标来最佳地优化治疗。
作为三例患者双心室CRT的一部分,使用个性化心脏电机械计算模型进行了一项计算机模拟左心室(LV)起搏部位优化研究。根据总激活时间(ΔTAT)变化和急性血流动力学反应(AHR)生成了治疗反应图,并与电功能、应变、应力和机械功的临床前指标进行比较,以评估它们对选择最佳起搏部位的适用性。在所有三例患者中,治疗反应对起搏位置高度敏感,后基底部位为最佳。发现ΔTAT和AHR相关(ρ < -0.80),AHR与起搏部位的临床前激活时间也相关(ρ ≥ 0.73),然而,在所有情况下,在最后激活部位起搏并未产生最佳治疗反应。
这项计算建模研究支持在后基底部位起搏,通过最小化起搏QRS时限并在窦性心律晚期激活的区域起搏来优化起搏部位。结果表明,使用多个临床前指标时信息内容是冗余的。重要的是,AHR与ΔTAT的相关性表明,最小化QRSd是优化导线放置的一个有前景的指标。