Azkune Calle Itxaso, Bocos Portillo Jone, Anton-Ladislao Ane, Gil Garcia Alberto, Gonzalez Diaz Eva, Gomez-Beldarrain Marian, Fernandez Maiztegi Covadonga, Pinedo Brochado Ana, Garcia-Monco Juan Carlos
Department of Neurology, Hospital de Galdakao-Usansolo,Vizcaya, Spain.
REDISSEC, Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network Research Unit, Hospital de Galdakao-Usansolo, Vizcaya, Spain.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Mar;26(3):582-588. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.11.117. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
Endovascular revascularization with mechanical devices has proven an effective treatment for proximal occlusions of the major intracranial arteries in stroke patients, but there is only limited information as to whether there should be an age limit for its use. We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endovascular revascularization in stroke patients aged 80 years and older, and compare the results with younger patients.
We prospectively collected 81 consecutive patients subjected to mechanical thrombectomy for proximal occlusion of the anterior circulation during a period of 27 months. According to age, patients were divided into those aged less than 80 years (younger group) and those aged 80 years and older (elderly group). We analyzed favorable outcome, successful and futile recanalization, neurological improvement, in-hospital complications, and mortality in both groups.
A favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at 3 months) was reached by 51.6% in the elderly group and 64% of younger patients, and neurological improvement (improvement of ≥4 points on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) was present in 77.4% of the elderly group. Overall, successful recanalization rates were 95.1% and futile recanalization reached 39% without statistically significant differences between both groups. Elderly patients presented more in-hospital complications (61.3% versus 38%) and higher mortality rates (16.1% versus 8%).
Clinical independence was reached in over half of elderly stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy, supporting the use of this treatment without age restriction.
使用机械装置进行血管内血运重建已被证明是治疗中风患者主要颅内动脉近端闭塞的有效方法,但关于其使用是否应有年龄限制的信息有限。我们旨在评估血管内血运重建在80岁及以上中风患者中的安全性和有效性,并将结果与年轻患者进行比较。
我们前瞻性地收集了在27个月期间连续接受机械取栓治疗前循环近端闭塞的81例患者。根据年龄,患者分为年龄小于80岁的患者(较年轻组)和年龄80岁及以上的患者(老年组)。我们分析了两组患者的良好预后、成功和无效再通、神经功能改善、住院并发症及死亡率。
老年组51.6%的患者和较年轻患者组64%达到了良好预后(3个月时改良Rankin量表评分≤2),老年组77.4%的患者有神经功能改善(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分提高≥4分)。总体而言,两组的成功再通率均为95.1%,无效再通率均为39%,两组间无统计学显著差异。老年患者出现更多的住院并发症(61.3%对38%)和更高的死亡率(16.1%对8%)。
超过半数接受机械取栓治疗的老年中风患者实现了临床独立,支持无年龄限制地使用这种治疗方法。