• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学校管理人员、家长与性教育:一个可解决的悖论?

School administrators, parents, and sex education: a resolvable paradox?

作者信息

Reis J, Seidl A

机构信息

School of Nursing, State University of New York, Buffalo.

出版信息

Adolescence. 1989 Fall;24(95):639-45.

PMID:2801285
Abstract

The emergence of AIDS as an untreatable, lethal disease, responding to educational prevention strategies in high-risk populations, has brought the issues of sex education in the public schools to the forefront. However, administrators, teachers, and parents perceive different barriers to sex education implementation. This study, undertaken in a northeastern, multigenerational, ethnic city, characterized by adolescent pregnancy rates a third higher than the state overall, polled 42 junior and senior high school administrators regarding educational priorities, perceived barriers to expansion of sex education, and preferred methods of introducing sex education. Administrators perceive parents as a major barrier to the introduction of more formalized sex education in their schools. Paradoxically, these same administrators felt that parents were generally uncomfortable in talking to their children about human sexuality. Recommendations are offered from existing models of health education for resolution of administrators' conflicting views on parental roles.

摘要

艾滋病作为一种无法治愈的致命疾病出现后,在高危人群中对教育预防策略产生了反应,这使得公立学校的性教育问题成为了焦点。然而,管理人员、教师和家长对性教育实施存在不同的障碍。这项研究在一个东北部的、多代同堂的、有多种族的城市进行,该城市的青少年怀孕率比全州总体水平高三分之一,调查了42名初中和高中管理人员关于教育重点、性教育扩展的感知障碍以及引入性教育的首选方法。管理人员认为家长是他们学校引入更正规性教育的主要障碍。矛盾的是,这些管理人员同样觉得家长通常不愿意与孩子谈论人类性行为。从现有的健康教育模式中提出了建议,以解决管理人员对家长角色的相互冲突的观点。

相似文献

1
School administrators, parents, and sex education: a resolvable paradox?学校管理人员、家长与性教育:一个可解决的悖论?
Adolescence. 1989 Fall;24(95):639-45.
2
Sexuality education in fifth and sixth grades in U.S. public schools, 1999.1999年美国公立学校五、六年级的性教育
Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 Sep-Oct;32(5):212-9.
3
Attitudes about AIDS education and condom availability among parents of high school students in New York City: a focus group approach.纽约市高中生家长对艾滋病教育及避孕套可得性的态度:焦点小组研究方法
AIDS Educ Prev. 1997 Feb;9(1):14-30.
4
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
5
Parental attitudes toward adolescent sexuality: transcultural perspectives.父母对青少年性行为的态度:跨文化视角
Nurse Pract. 1987 Aug;12(8):43-8.
6
[Attitudes of Costa Rican students and teachers on sex and population education].[哥斯达黎加学生和教师对性与人口教育的态度]
Perspect Int Planif Fam. 1987(Spec No):1-6.
7
What public school teachers teach about preventing pregnancy, AIDS and sexually transmitted diseases.公立学校教师讲授的关于预防怀孕、艾滋病和性传播疾病的内容。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1989 Mar-Apr;21(2):65-72.
8
Parent opinion of sexuality education in a state with mandated abstinence education: does policy match parental preference?在一个强制推行禁欲教育的州,家长对性教育的看法:政策与家长偏好相符吗?
J Adolesc Health. 2006 Nov;39(5):634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.04.022. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
9
Support for comprehensive sexuality education: perspectives from parents of school-age youth.对全面性教育的支持:学龄青少年家长的观点
J Adolesc Health. 2008 Apr;42(4):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.019. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
10
The availability of sex education in large city school districts.大城市学区性教育的可获得性。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1984 Jan-Feb;16(1):19-25.

引用本文的文献

1
What will it take? Using an implementation research framework to identify facilitators and barriers in implementing a school-based referral system for sexual health services.需要什么?利用实施研究框架确定在学校实施性健康服务转介系统的促进因素和障碍。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 7;20(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05147-z.