Ghahari Shima, Hassani Hamidreza, Purmofrad Maryam
Department of Foreign Languages, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Department of Foreign Language Studies, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Aug;46(4):863-875. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9467-6.
Unlike such cognitive impairments as autism and schizophrenia, the speech pattern in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has largely remained underrepresented. We examined the pragmatic competence of OCD-affected individuals under two variant modes: pragmatic recognition and pragmatic production. In the recognition phase, the informants completed a discourse completion test around two speech acts of request and apology (20 high power distance situations). The production phase was carried out through an interview during which the informants' communication behaviors were rated on the basis of the Orion's pragmatic language skills checklist (OPLS) subscales. No significant difference was observed between the normal and OCD groups in terms of pragmatic recognition. Moreover, considering the OPLS subscales, although the normal controls significantly outperformed in non-verbal communication and expressive skills, the overall pragmatic production ability of the two groups was statistically alike. The results are discussed in relation to the two competing disorders of autism and social anxiety.
与自闭症和精神分裂症等认知障碍不同,强迫症(OCD)患者的言语模式在很大程度上仍未得到充分研究。我们在两种不同模式下考察了强迫症患者的语用能力:语用识别和语用生成。在识别阶段,被试围绕请求和道歉这两种言语行为完成了一个语篇补全测试(20个高权力距离情境)。生成阶段通过访谈进行,在此期间,根据猎户座语用语言技能清单(OPLS)子量表对被试的沟通行为进行评分。在语用识别方面,正常组和强迫症组之间未观察到显著差异。此外,考虑到OPLS子量表,尽管正常对照组在非言语沟通和表达技能方面明显表现更优,但两组的整体语用生成能力在统计学上是相似的。我们结合自闭症和社交焦虑这两种相关疾病对结果进行了讨论。