• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贸易、劳动力市场与健康。

Trade, Labour Markets and Health.

作者信息

McNamara Courtney, Labonté Ronald

机构信息

1 Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Dragvoll, Trondheim, Norway.

2 School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2017 Apr;47(2):277-297. doi: 10.1177/0020731416684325. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1177/0020731416684325
PMID:28013576
Abstract

Previous analyses indicate that there are a number of potentially serious health risks associated with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The objective of this work is to provide further insight into the potential health impacts of the TPP by investigating labour market pathways. The impact of the TPP on employment and working conditions is a major point of contention in broader public debates. In public health literature, these factors are considered fundamental determinants of health, yet they are rarely addressed in analyses of trade and investment agreements. We therefore undertake a prospective policy analysis of the TPP through a content analysis of the agreement's Labour Chapter. Provisions of the Chapter are analyzed with reference to the health policy triangle and four main areas through which labour markets influence health: power relations, social policies, employment conditions and working conditions. Findings indicate that implementation of the TPP can have important impacts on health through labour market pathways. While the Labour Chapter is being presented by proponents of the agreement as a vehicle for improvement in labour standards, we find little evidence to support this view. Instead, we find several ways the TPP may weaken employment relations to the detriment of health.

摘要

先前的分析表明,跨太平洋伙伴关系协定(TPP)存在一些潜在的严重健康风险。这项工作的目的是通过调查劳动力市场途径,进一步深入了解TPP对健康的潜在影响。TPP对就业和工作条件的影响是更广泛公众辩论中的一个主要争议点。在公共卫生文献中,这些因素被视为健康的基本决定因素,但在贸易和投资协定分析中却很少涉及。因此,我们通过对该协定《劳工章节》的内容分析,对TPP进行前瞻性政策分析。本章条款参照健康政策三角以及劳动力市场影响健康的四个主要领域进行分析:权力关系、社会政策、就业条件和工作条件。研究结果表明,TPP的实施可通过劳动力市场途径对健康产生重要影响。虽然该协定的支持者将《劳工章节》作为提高劳工标准的工具,但我们几乎找不到支持这一观点的证据。相反,我们发现TPP可能通过几种方式削弱雇佣关系,对健康造成损害。

相似文献

1
Trade, Labour Markets and Health.贸易、劳动力市场与健康。
Int J Health Serv. 2017 Apr;47(2):277-297. doi: 10.1177/0020731416684325. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
2
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:它对健康的影响是否如我们所担心的那样?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Aug 1;5(8):487-496. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.41.
3
Analyzing the impact of trade and investment agreements on pharmaceutical policy: provisions, pathways and potential impacts.分析贸易和投资协定对药品政策的影响:规定、途径和潜在影响。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0518-2.
4
Assessing the Health Impact of Trade: A Call for an Expanded Research Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".评估贸易对健康的影响:扩大研究议程的呼吁——评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样对健康造成影响?”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):293-294. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.126.
5
Is health impact assessment useful in the context of trade negotiations? A case study of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement.健康影响评估在贸易谈判背景下是否有用?跨太平洋伙伴关系协定的案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e010339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010339.
6
A new generation of trade policy: potential risks to diet-related health from the trans pacific partnership agreement.新一代贸易政策:跨太平洋伙伴关系协定对饮食相关健康的潜在风险。
Global Health. 2013 Oct 16;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-46.
7
The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Trading away our health?《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》:拿我们的健康做交易?
Can J Public Health. 2015 Apr 29;106(4):e249-51. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4896.
8
Advancing Public Health on the Changing Global Trade and Investment Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".推进变化中的全球贸易和投资议程中的公共卫生事业——评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样影响健康?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):295-298. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.129.
9
USMCA (NAFTA 2.0): tightening the constraints on the right to regulate for public health.美墨加协定(北美自由贸易协定 2.0):收紧对监管公共健康的权利的限制。
Global Health. 2019 May 14;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0476-8.
10
The Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement and Pharmaceutical Regulation in Canada and Australia.《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》与加拿大和澳大利亚的药品监管
Int J Health Serv. 2016 Oct;46(4):597-613. doi: 10.1177/0020731416662612. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective policy analysis-a critical interpretive synthesis review.前瞻性政策分析——批判性解释性综合评价综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Apr 10;39(4):429-441. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae009.
2
Health policy triangle framework: Narrative review of the recent literature.健康政策三角框架:近期文献的叙述性综述
Health Policy Open. 2020 Oct 6;1:100016. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100016. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
The Mediating Effect of Healthcare Utilization on Livelihood Empowerment against Poverty (LEAP) and Health Security of Older Adults in Ghana: A Case Study on the Ga-West Municipality in Accra, Ghana.
医疗服务利用对加纳老年人摆脱贫困的生计赋权(LEAP)和健康安全的中介作用:以加纳阿克拉的加西区市为例
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 14;10(2):370. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020370.
4
Defining the commercial determinants of health: a systematic review.定义健康的商业决定因素:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):1022. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09126-1.
5
USMCA (NAFTA 2.0): tightening the constraints on the right to regulate for public health.美墨加协定(北美自由贸易协定 2.0):收紧对监管公共健康的权利的限制。
Global Health. 2019 May 14;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0476-8.
6
International trade and investment law: a new framework for public health and the common good.国际贸易与投资法:公共卫生与共同利益的新框架。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 8;18(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5486-6.
7
The TPP Is Dead, Long Live the TPP? A Response to Recent Commentaries.《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》已死,《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》万岁?对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):245-247. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.12.