• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing the Health Impact of Trade: A Call for an Expanded Research Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".评估贸易对健康的影响:扩大研究议程的呼吁——评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样对健康造成影响?”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):293-294. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.126.
2
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Should We "Fear the Fear"? Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:我们应该“恐惧恐惧”吗?》评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们担心的那样对健康不利?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):353-355. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.140.
3
Advancing Public Health on the Changing Global Trade and Investment Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".推进变化中的全球贸易和投资议程中的公共卫生事业——评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样影响健康?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):295-298. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.129.
4
Just Say No to the TPP: A Democratic Setback for American and Asian Public Health Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".对 TPP 说不:美国和亚洲公共卫生的民主挫折 评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们担心的那样对健康不利?”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jul 1;6(7):419-421. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.145.
5
Trade Policy and Health: Adding Retrospective Studies to the Research Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".贸易政策与健康:将回顾性研究纳入研究议程——评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样影响健康?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):243-244. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.123.
6
Trade, Labour Markets and Health.贸易、劳动力市场与健康。
Int J Health Serv. 2017 Apr;47(2):277-297. doi: 10.1177/0020731416684325. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
7
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:它对健康的影响是否如我们所担心的那样?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Aug 1;5(8):487-496. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.41.
8
Current Models of Investor State Dispute Settlement Are Bad for Health: The European Union Could Offer an Alternative Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".现行的投资者与国家争端解决模式不利于健康:欧盟可能提供另一种方案——评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们担心的那样对健康不利?”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Mar 1;6(3):177-179. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.116.
9
Is health impact assessment useful in the context of trade negotiations? A case study of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement.健康影响评估在贸易谈判背景下是否有用?跨太平洋伙伴关系协定的案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e010339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010339.
10
The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Trading away our health?《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》:拿我们的健康做交易?
Can J Public Health. 2015 Apr 29;106(4):e249-51. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4896.

引用本文的文献

1
The TPP Is Dead, Long Live the TPP? A Response to Recent Commentaries.《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》已死,《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》万岁?对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):245-247. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.12.

本文引用的文献

1
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:它对健康的影响是否如我们所担心的那样?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Aug 1;5(8):487-496. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.41.
2
Trade and investment liberalization, food systems change and highly processed food consumption: a natural experiment contrasting the soft-drink markets of Peru and Bolivia.贸易与投资自由化、食品体系变革与高加工食品消费:一项对比秘鲁和玻利维亚软饮料市场的自然实验。
Global Health. 2016 Jun 2;12(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0161-0.
3
Is health impact assessment useful in the context of trade negotiations? A case study of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement.健康影响评估在贸易谈判背景下是否有用?跨太平洋伙伴关系协定的案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e010339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010339.
4
The role of trade and investment liberalization in the sugar-sweetened carbonated beverages market: a natural experiment contrasting Vietnam and the Philippines.贸易与投资自由化在含糖碳酸饮料市场中的作用:以越南和菲律宾对比的自然实验
Global Health. 2015 Oct 12;11:41. doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0127-7.
5
Trade liberalization, social policies and health: an empirical case study.贸易自由化、社会政策与健康:一项实证案例研究。
Global Health. 2015 Oct 12;11:42. doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0126-8.
6
Trade and health in Samoa: views from the insiders.萨摩亚的贸易与健康:业内人士的观点
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 4;14:309. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-309.
7
A new generation of trade policy: potential risks to diet-related health from the trans pacific partnership agreement.新一代贸易政策:跨太平洋伙伴关系协定对饮食相关健康的潜在风险。
Global Health. 2013 Oct 16;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-46.
8
Work, worklessness and the political economy of health inequalities.工作、失业与健康不平等的政治经济学。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Sep;65(9):746-50. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.102103. Epub 2011 Jan 30.
9
Trade and social determinants of health.贸易与健康的社会决定因素。
Lancet. 2009 Feb 7;373(9662):502-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61777-8. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
10
Trade and health: an agenda for action.贸易与健康:行动议程
Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):768-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61780-8. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

评估贸易对健康的影响:扩大研究议程的呼吁——评“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样对健康造成影响?”

Assessing the Health Impact of Trade: A Call for an Expanded Research Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):293-294. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.126.

DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.126
PMID:28812818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5417152/
Abstract

Labonté et al provide an insightful analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and its impact on a selection of important health determinants. Their work confirms concerns raised by previous analyses of leaked drafts and offers governments serious and timely reasons to carefully consider provisions of the agreement prior to moving forward with ratification. It also contributes more generally to a growing literature focused on identifying the health impacts of trade. This commentary uses the authors' analysis as a starting point to reflect on two interrelated issues relevant both for taking seriously one of the article's main recommendations and future work in the area of trade and health.

摘要

拉邦特等人对《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(TPP)及其对一系列重要健康决定因素的影响进行了深刻分析。他们的工作证实了之前对泄露草案的分析提出的担忧,并为各国政府在批准协议前进之前提供了认真和及时的理由,仔细考虑协议的规定。它也更广泛地为越来越多关注贸易对健康影响的文献做出了贡献。本评论文章利用作者的分析作为出发点,反思与认真对待其主要建议之一以及贸易和健康领域未来工作相关的两个相互关联的问题。