Beyaz Serbülent Gökhan
Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017 Jan-Feb;67(1):21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.06.003. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
A cross-sectional study.
We compared the 12 month outcomes of fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections with interlaminar epidural steroid injections for the treatment of chronic lumbar spinal pain. Chronic lower back pain is a multifactorial disorder with many possible etiologies. The lifetime prevalence of spinal pain is reportedly 65-80% in the neck and lower back. Epidural injection of corticosteroids is a commonly used intervention for managing chronic spinal pain.
Patients who did not benefit from previous treatments were included in this study. Injections were performed according to magnetic resonance imaging findings at the nearest level of lumbar pathology; 173 patients received interlaminar epidural steroid injections and 126 patients received transforaminal epidural steroid injections. All of the patients were regularly followed up for 12 months using a verbal numeric rating scale. Magnetic resonance imaging findings, complications, verbal numeric rating scale, and satisfaction scores were recorded.
Lumbar disk pathology was the most frequently encountered problem. The interlaminar epidural steroid injections were preferred at the L4-L5 intervertebral level. Verbal numeric rating scale scores significantly decreased during the 12-month period compared to basal scores (p<0.001). Significant differences between the two groups according to verbal numeric rating scale and satisfaction scores were not observed (p>0.05). There were no major complications; however, the interlaminar epidural steroid injections group had 22 (12.7%) minor complications, and the transforaminal epidural steroid injections group had 12 (9.5%) minor complications.
This study showed that interlaminar epidural steroid injections can be as effective as transforaminal epidural steroid injections when performed at the nearest level of lumbar pathology using fluoroscopy in 12-month intervals.
一项横断面研究。
我们比较了透视引导下经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射与椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射治疗慢性腰椎疼痛的12个月疗效。慢性下腰痛是一种多因素疾病,有多种可能的病因。据报道,脊柱疼痛在颈部和下背部的终生患病率为65% - 80%。硬膜外注射皮质类固醇是治疗慢性脊柱疼痛常用的干预措施。
本研究纳入了之前治疗无效的患者。根据腰椎病变最接近节段的磁共振成像结果进行注射;173例患者接受椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射,126例患者接受经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射。所有患者均使用言语数字评定量表定期随访12个月。记录磁共振成像结果、并发症、言语数字评定量表及满意度评分。
腰椎间盘病变是最常见的问题。椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射在L4 - L5椎间隙更常用。与基础评分相比,言语数字评定量表评分在12个月期间显著降低(p<0.001)。两组在言语数字评定量表和满意度评分方面未观察到显著差异(p>0.05)。无严重并发症;然而,椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射组有22例(12.7%)轻微并发症,经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射组有12例(9.5%)轻微并发症。
本研究表明,在透视引导下,以12个月为间隔,在腰椎病变最接近节段进行椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射与经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射效果相当。