Suppr超能文献

接受硬膜外类固醇注射的腰痛患者的疗效评估

Outcome measurement in patients with low back pain undergoing epidural steroid injection.

作者信息

Erçalık Tülay, Gencer Atalay Kardelen, Şanal Toprak Canan, Gündüz Osman Hakan

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Algology, Istanbul Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Marmara University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Apr 18;65(2):154-159. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2350. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of epidural steroid injection (ESI) in patients with low back pain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study included a total of 82 patients (51 females; 31 males; mean age 50.8±14.2 years; range, 17 to 86 years) who underwent ESI due to lumbar disc hernia-induced radiculopathy between September 2014 and May 2015. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability Index (ILBPDI), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) were administered to all patients before and three weeks and three months after ESI.

RESULTS

The mean scores of all scales were significantly lower at three weeks and three months following ESI compared to the baseline scores. There were no significant differences between the mean scores at three weeks and three months. The NRS yielded the highest post-ESI change from baseline.

CONCLUSION

Our study results showed that all scales used in this study were effective tools for the evaluation of outcomes of EPI in patients with low back pain. Although the NRS yielded the highest sensitivity for detecting change, evaluating functional state and quality of life is essential for multivariate analyses.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)治疗腰痛患者的效果。

患者与方法

这项前瞻性研究共纳入了82例患者(51例女性;31例男性;平均年龄50.8±14.2岁;范围为17至86岁),这些患者在2014年9月至2015年5月期间因腰椎间盘突出症所致神经根病接受了ESI治疗。在ESI治疗前、治疗后三周和三个月,对所有患者进行了数字评分量表(NRS)、奥斯维斯特残疾指数(ODI)、伊斯坦布尔腰痛残疾指数(ILBPDI)以及简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)评估。

结果

与基线评分相比,ESI治疗后三周和三个月时所有量表的平均得分均显著降低。三周和三个月时的平均得分之间无显著差异。NRS在ESI治疗后相对于基线的变化最大。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,本研究中使用的所有量表都是评估ESI治疗腰痛患者效果的有效工具。尽管NRS在检测变化方面具有最高的敏感性,但评估功能状态和生活质量对于多变量分析至关重要。

相似文献

1
Outcome measurement in patients with low back pain undergoing epidural steroid injection.接受硬膜外类固醇注射的腰痛患者的疗效评估
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Apr 18;65(2):154-159. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2350. eCollection 2019 Jun.

引用本文的文献

3

本文引用的文献

8
Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain.非特异性下腰痛临床试验的核心结局领域
Eur Spine J. 2015 Jun;24(6):1127-42. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3892-3. Epub 2015 Apr 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验