Moront M L, Gotschall C S, Eichelberger M R
Department of Surgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010-2970, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Aug;31(8):1183-6; discussion 1187-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90114-1.
The authors compared air and ground transport to a level I pediatric trauma center to assess the effectiveness of helicopter transport of injured children. They also performed a retrospective assessment of triage criteria and utilization patterns for helicopter transports. The sample comprised 3,861 children who were admitted (consecutively) to an urban level I pediatric trauma center during a 4-year period and who were transported by emergency medical services. TRISS probability of survival (P2),z, and W scores were used to compare outcomes of ground and air transports. An absolute value of z greater than 1.96 indicates a statistically significant difference in mortality rate; the W statistic represents the number of survivors more than expected per 100 patients treated. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify optimal triage criteria, using P6 < .95 to define children who potentially could benefit from air transport. The triage criteria were applied to the air transport group to determine overtriage rates. Nearly 75% of the children arrived directly from the scene of injury. Those transported by air were more severely injured, as shown by significant differences in the mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), P6, Injury Severity Score, and mortality rate. The better survival rate for children transported by helicopter was indicated by a TRISS z score of 2.81, compared with a z score of 0.31 for those transported by ambulance. The W statistic for the children transported by air was 1.11. ROC analysis identified GCS < 12 and heart rate > 160 beats per minute as optimal air triage criteria; these yielded 99% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Using these criteria, approximately 85% of air transports would be considered overtriage. The authors conclude that (1) helicopter transport was associated with better survival rates among urban injured children; (2) pediatric helicopter triage criteria based on GCS and heart rate may improve helicopter resource utilization without compromising care; and (3) current air triage practices result in overuse of helicopters in approximately 85% of flights.
作者比较了将受伤儿童空运和陆运至一级儿科创伤中心的情况,以评估直升机转运受伤儿童的有效性。他们还对直升机转运的分诊标准和使用模式进行了回顾性评估。样本包括在4年期间(连续)入住城市一级儿科创伤中心且由紧急医疗服务转运的3861名儿童。使用创伤严重度特异性生存概率(P2)、z值和W值来比较陆运和空运的结果。z值的绝对值大于1.96表明死亡率存在统计学显著差异;W统计量表示每治疗100名患者中幸存者超出预期的数量。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线来确定最佳分诊标准,使用P6 < 0.95来定义可能从空运中受益的儿童。将分诊标准应用于空运组以确定过度分诊率。近75%的儿童直接从受伤现场送来。空运的儿童伤势更严重,这体现在平均格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、P6、损伤严重度评分和死亡率的显著差异上。直升机转运儿童的生存率更高,创伤严重度特异性生存概率z评分为2.81,而救护车转运儿童的z评分为0.31。空运儿童的W统计量为1.11。ROC分析确定GCS < 12且心率> 160次/分钟为最佳空运分诊标准;这些标准的敏感性为99%,特异性为90%。使用这些标准,约85%的空运可能被视为过度分诊。作者得出结论:(1)直升机转运与城市受伤儿童的较高生存率相关;(2)基于GCS和心率的儿科直升机分诊标准可提高直升机资源利用率且不影响治疗;(3)目前的空运分诊做法导致约85%的航班直升机使用过度。