Hu Hai, Zhang Kai, Zhao Gang, Jiang Zhaoyan, Huang Anhua, Cai Jingli, Xu Anan, Li Haidong, He Chuanqi, Ding Kan, Lu Ruiqi, Ye Ruiqi
East Hospital Affiliated with Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Medical School of Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Nov 23;13:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.11.010. eCollection 2017 Jan.
Traditional laparaendoscopic surgery using CO2 pneumoperitoneum is associated with complications and the existing gasless laparaendoscopic surgery has shortcomings such as poor visibility in the operation field. To overcome the disadvantages of the current lifting gasless laparaendoscopic operation platforms, we developed an inflatable device for gasless laparoscopic operation field formation (LOFF) that can be internally installed and applied in practice.
We initially designed operation platforms for gasless laparaendoscopic single-port (GLESP) surgery. Subsequently, a triangular prismatic LOFF device was selected and applied successfully to GLESP cholecystectomy of five pigs. Ultimately, using pigs as a model, three surgical approaches (LOFF-assisted laparaendoscopic single-site (LOFF-LESS), LESS surgery, and traditional lifting (GLESP) were compared, and the advantages and drawbacks of inflatable devices for gasless laparoscopic operation field assessed.
The use of the LOFF device in GLESP cholecystectomy was first evaluated. The time for surgical space formation (4.4 ± 1.2 and 4.8 ± 1.0), the operating time for gallbladder removal (25.2 ± 4.8 and 25.4 ± 2.7), and the loss of blood (9.4 ± 3.1and 9.2 ± 2.4) was similar between LESS and LOFF, respectively (Table 2). In contrast these parameters were higher in GLESP (6.6 ± 1.0, 30.3 ± 4.4 and 10.1 ± 2.0, respectively. The LOFF-LESS surgery exhibited a clearer exposure of the surgical field and shorter operating time than the GLESP surgery. LESS technology showed less postoperation pain, fast recovery, and extremely high cosmetic satisfaction.
The LOFF device provides a safe, effective, and feasible operation platform that can be internally installed and inflated for GLESP surgery during cholescytectomy in animal models.
传统的使用二氧化碳气腹的腹腔镜手术存在并发症,而现有的免气腹腹腔镜手术存在术野视野不佳等缺点。为克服当前免气腹腹腔镜手术平台的缺点,我们开发了一种可内部安装并应用于实际的用于形成免气腹腹腔镜术野的充气装置(LOFF)。
我们最初设计了免气腹腹腔镜单孔手术(GLESP)的手术平台。随后,选择了一个三棱柱形的LOFF装置并成功应用于5头猪的GLESP胆囊切除术。最终,以猪为模型,比较了三种手术方式(LOFF辅助腹腔镜单部位手术(LOFF-LESS)、LESS手术和传统提拉式(GLESP)),并评估了免气腹腹腔镜术野充气装置的优缺点。
首次评估了LOFF装置在GLESP胆囊切除术中的应用。LESS和LOFF之间手术空间形成时间(分别为4.4±1.2和4.8±1.0)、胆囊切除手术时间(分别为25.2±4.8和25.4±2.7)以及失血量(分别为9.4±3.1和9.2±2.4)相似(表2)。相比之下,这些参数在GLESP中更高(分别为6.6±1.0、30.3±4.4和10.1±2.0)。与GLESP手术相比,LOFF-LESS手术术野暴露更清晰,手术时间更短。LESS技术术后疼痛较轻、恢复快且美容满意度极高。
在动物模型的胆囊切除术中,LOFF装置为GLESP手术提供了一个安全、有效且可行的可内部安装和充气的手术平台。